<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The mathematics of music</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/3581/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/3581</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/3581/comment-page-1#comment-8731</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 09:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-8731</guid>
		<description>1966 I think you mean 1962 or 63!!!! Great promotion for the Beatles??????  Remenber all that Beatle stuff  companies were selling Lunch box&#039;s /Bubble gum cards/ TV trays/wigs/Boots/ Dolls and all the other stuff??????  The Beatles made nothing or very little off of any of it!!! And this was one reason why they got to be so popular!!!!! Lot&#039;s of Free Promotion!!!!! The Beatles are one of the Best(not pete) reasons for P2P file sharing!!!! Making nothing off your fame but only getting bigger from all that FREE Promotion and selling a sh*t load of records in the process!!!!!! The Riaa needs to look back at history  and learn a lesson!!!! Sell a sh*t load of music from all that FREE promotion on P2P!!!!!! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1966 I think you mean 1962 or 63!!!! Great promotion for the Beatles??????  Remenber all that Beatle stuff  companies were selling Lunch box&#8217;s /Bubble gum cards/ TV trays/wigs/Boots/ Dolls and all the other stuff??????  The Beatles made nothing or very little off of any of it!!! And this was one reason why they got to be so popular!!!!! Lot&#8217;s of Free Promotion!!!!! The Beatles are one of the Best(not pete) reasons for P2P file sharing!!!! Making nothing off your fame but only getting bigger from all that FREE Promotion and selling a sh*t load of records in the process!!!!!! The Riaa needs to look back at history  and learn a lesson!!!! Sell a sh*t load of music from all that FREE promotion on P2P!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/3581/comment-page-1#comment-8730</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 07:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-8730</guid>
		<description>The Beatles succeeded because they were fresh, exciting, brilliant, cute, and last but not least, expertly promoted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Beatles succeeded because they were fresh, exciting, brilliant, cute, and last but not least, expertly promoted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/3581/comment-page-1#comment-8721</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 02:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-8721</guid>
		<description>âHad HSS existed in 1966 and had Decca used it to evaluate a certain demo that arrived they may not have turn down the Beatles, whose music sounded very risky for the times,â it states.

I think they&#039;re right in at least one aspect of this statement. The Beatles would have done well because their music was the ultimate cookie cutter type pop 
of its day. Just look at the audiences in their concerts.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>âHad HSS existed in 1966 and had Decca used it to evaluate a certain demo that arrived they may not have turn down the Beatles, whose music sounded very risky for the times,â it states.</p>
<p>I think they&#8217;re right in at least one aspect of this statement. The Beatles would have done well because their music was the ultimate cookie cutter type pop<br />
of its day. Just look at the audiences in their concerts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/3581/comment-page-1#comment-8719</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 01:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-8719</guid>
		<description>How condescending of them to market only based on cold hard numbers.

As if the human mind can be quantized and predicted.

They&#039;re like the archetypal male sheuvenist using a calculated pattern to woo women.. and it is having exactly the same real effect...  anyone with a modicum of grey matter between their ears is looking around and saying.. &quot;why are all the radio stations the same?&quot; and &quot;I&#039;m tired of this.. no more money for cd&#039;s&quot;

the record company is getting what it deserves for this insulting presumption... a swift slap in the face.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How condescending of them to market only based on cold hard numbers.</p>
<p>As if the human mind can be quantized and predicted.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re like the archetypal male sheuvenist using a calculated pattern to woo women.. and it is having exactly the same real effect&#8230;  anyone with a modicum of grey matter between their ears is looking around and saying.. &#8220;why are all the radio stations the same?&#8221; and &#8220;I&#8217;m tired of this.. no more money for cd&#8217;s&#8221;</p>
<p>the record company is getting what it deserves for this insulting presumption&#8230; a swift slap in the face.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


