<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bring iPod tax back !</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/3623/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/3623</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/3623/comment-page-1#comment-8809</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2005 07:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-8809</guid>
		<description>From a conference held recently in Ontario. Copyright Board General Counsel Mario Bouchard said, &quot;Richard Pfohl says the recording industry has lost 1/2 Billion in the last five years. Assuming this is true what he is refering to is the manufacturers suggested retail price on a CD. The Copyright Board determined that there is $2.25 in copyright on each CD. If you boil down that $450 Billion you get $50 Million in lost copyright. The copyright board has collected $30 Million a year.&quot;

I think the industry is well compensated already and compensation really isn&#039;t the point for CRIA and others - they want to control the distribution of music which is a whole &#039;nother kettle of fish.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From a conference held recently in Ontario. Copyright Board General Counsel Mario Bouchard said, &#8220;Richard Pfohl says the recording industry has lost 1/2 Billion in the last five years. Assuming this is true what he is refering to is the manufacturers suggested retail price on a CD. The Copyright Board determined that there is $2.25 in copyright on each CD. If you boil down that $450 Billion you get $50 Million in lost copyright. The copyright board has collected $30 Million a year.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think the industry is well compensated already and compensation really isn&#8217;t the point for CRIA and others &#8211; they want to control the distribution of music which is a whole &#8216;nother kettle of fish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/3623/comment-page-1#comment-8808</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2005 06:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-8808</guid>
		<description>see also: http://cpcc.ca/english/pdf/AppealFCARulingDARs.pdf </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>see also: <a href="http://cpcc.ca/english/pdf/AppealFCARulingDARs.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://cpcc.ca/english/pdf/AppealFCARulingDARs.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/3623/comment-page-1#comment-8798</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2005 01:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-8798</guid>
		<description>Actually I think you miss the point of what&#039;s going on. The fact that the tax has been removed is actually bad for consumers. By removing the tax on the iPod, this gives the music industry in Canada leverage to justify suing citizens since they can claim that they are no longer being compensated. The whole concept of the taxes was to prevent the catastophe that has eclipsed the US with the RIAA suing every average Joe out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually I think you miss the point of what&#8217;s going on. The fact that the tax has been removed is actually bad for consumers. By removing the tax on the iPod, this gives the music industry in Canada leverage to justify suing citizens since they can claim that they are no longer being compensated. The whole concept of the taxes was to prevent the catastophe that has eclipsed the US with the RIAA suing every average Joe out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/3623/comment-page-1#comment-8795</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2005 20:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-8795</guid>
		<description>Source = statement on mi2n:

http://www.mi2n.com/press.php3?press_nb=75864

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Source = statement on mi2n:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mi2n.com/press.php3?press_nb=75864" rel="nofollow">http://www.mi2n.com/press.php3?press_nb=75864</a></p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/3623/comment-page-1#comment-8792</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2005 18:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-8792</guid>
		<description>&quot;The levies set by the Board were $2 for non-removable memory capacity of up to 1 Gigabyte (GB) in a digital audio recorder, $15 for memory capacity of more than one gig and up to 10, and $25 for more than 10.&quot;

what moron allowed such a rate structure?

anyone who knows moore&#039;s law knows what this REALLY means over the long run is that EVERY memory based player will be taxed $25 regardless of how cheap it is.

There is a forseeable future in which hard drive based players with 15 gigs of memory are tossed into bargain bins at the supermarket and cost little more than a can of soup.  In such a situation, moore&#039;s law has been successfully leveraged to assure a several THOUSAND percent royalty.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The levies set by the Board were $2 for non-removable memory capacity of up to 1 Gigabyte (GB) in a digital audio recorder, $15 for memory capacity of more than one gig and up to 10, and $25 for more than 10.&#8221;</p>
<p>what moron allowed such a rate structure?</p>
<p>anyone who knows moore&#8217;s law knows what this REALLY means over the long run is that EVERY memory based player will be taxed $25 regardless of how cheap it is.</p>
<p>There is a forseeable future in which hard drive based players with 15 gigs of memory are tossed into bargain bins at the supermarket and cost little more than a can of soup.  In such a situation, moore&#8217;s law has been successfully leveraged to assure a several THOUSAND percent royalty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/3623/comment-page-1#comment-8782</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2005 06:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-8782</guid>
		<description>Where did this information come from?

Was the interview done by p2pnet?
Did it pass on TV?

What&#039;s the source?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where did this information come from?</p>
<p>Was the interview done by p2pnet?<br />
Did it pass on TV?</p>
<p>What&#8217;s the source?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


