Horrifying online kiddie porn case
p2pnet view Crime:- One of the world’s most horrifying online child pornography channels has been uncovered in Denmark.
An 59-year-old Århus man allegedly downloaded more than half a million pictures of “sexual assault on children under the age of three”, says the Copenhagen Post.
The children were from Eastern Europe or Asia, it says.
The man, charged with disseminating the material over five years between 2004 and 2009, was slated to face a preliminary court hearing today, says the story, going on:
“Police are also trying to get a 27-year-old man remanded to custody in connection with the case, but the investigation into his involvement is still ongoing.”
The Copenhagen Post has deputy superintendent Lars Jung sayng some of the children were only a few months old.
According to stiften.dk, “some show the smallest children tied up while they are subject to sexual assault”, it adds.
..… and identi.ca
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win ~ Mahatma Gandhi
Copenhagen Post – Man charged in child pornography case, February 26, 2010
Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. Subscribe to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/feed
Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details.
February 26th, 2010 at 3:31 pm
That is just disgusting. He should fry.
February 26th, 2010 at 4:45 pm
I am expecting to see a lot of stuff related to the entertainement corporation of parasites within this “crime” section particularly those concerning crimes committed against children since these corporations and the governments who protect them are full of pederasts.
We will eradicate to protect our kids. Sorry but protecting our kids is hardwired in our brain just as it is in grizzly bears and tigers.
We can not help it. You see even hard core criminals can not take these.
Sorry.
February 26th, 2010 at 7:51 pm
Excuse me: HALF A MILLION pictures??!! Thats a lot of pictures! I would imagine it would be difficult to accumulate that many pictures of adult naked ladies, or for that matter, steam locomotives! Even assuming many of the pictures are not genuine, that is they are photoshopped or drawings, paintings etc., I would question if the cops involved are exaggerating the number just as they do with the street value of drugs. And since this individual is only collecting the porn, wouldn’t it be more reasonable for the cops to pursue the authors of the stuff? Surely a group of pornographers who upload half a million files can’t be all that hard to locate….assuming they exist at all. Frankly, this sounds a bit like the “snuff film” hoaxes of the past. Consider: where are all the “models” for this depraved stuff coming from? Enough three year old kids to create half a million pictures? Are there that many lost kids on milk cartons?
February 26th, 2010 at 8:05 pm
Astro: Depends if he was accumulating them one by one or in batches. Seeing as he was charged with distribution, it’s likely that he had people regularly feeding him this shit in batches.
February 26th, 2010 at 8:35 pm
Police always fabricate numbers and greatly exaggerate a suspect’s “crimes” – only to back off as the real truth later emerges. Ever-fearful of budget cuts, cops on any specialized ‘task force’ are under constant pressure to justify their existense. No one wants to be ‘demoted’ back to traffic cop just so the town can balance its budget. So every pissant loser looking for illegal internet porn gets transformed into a major kingpin of “organized crime”.
Could it be that the incredible number of “500 thousand” pictures were really just a few videos? @30 frames per second, each counted as a complete image, that can soon add up.
Plenty of innocent baby pictures exist that under the law would constitute child pornography. Probably have a few myself.
February 26th, 2010 at 9:08 pm
The news release stated that the half million pix were all “sexual assault on children under the age of three”. In fact they said MORE than half a million. Do the numbers: A cop sits in front of a monitor and looks at one picture every 10 seconds. Thats six per minute, 360 an hour. In an 8 hour day, assuming thats all he does, he looks at 2880 pix. Thats a little less than half a year of watching porn, all day, every day. Do you really think the cop could say honestly that there are no duplicates? How many weeks before his eyes glazed over. Yet, they already know that this is the case. All 500000 pix are vile, evil stuff, none of them are adult women, kittens, flowers, nope every last one is a kid getting assaulted in some anatomically impossible manner. I really hope some lawyer exposes the lies of these cops. Not because I support some insane porn collector but because the cops are supposed to the the honest “good guys”, not the biggest liars on the block. This use of kid porn to get control of just about everything is as disgusting as any Third Reich lie was 75 years ago. Why not say the loon had 5 million pictures? Or had the kids secreted in his basement for good measure.
February 26th, 2010 at 9:14 pm
@ Astroboi:
It’d be enough if only one of the 500,000 (or more) images showed a child being abused sexually, or in any other way.
If you want to have a go at police dishonesty, you’d do better with another subject.
Cheers!
February 26th, 2010 at 9:48 pm
No offense meant Jon but somehow telling monumental lies is never justified when the liars are in positions of authority. And this idea that looking at a picture is the same as doing what is shown IN the picture is rubbish. I like to read about the Mafia, Yakuza, all sorts of organised crime and have enjoyed this since I saw The Godfather decades ago. I have many books, WITH PICTURES, of mobsters and the cops that are their opposite numbers. But never have I wanted to BE a mobster. Or a cop for that matter. If somebody suggested that possessing a picture of John Gotti was the same as being a crime family don, they would be laughed at, and rightly so.
But worse is this recent nonsense that kid porn means that our legal system goes out the window and any means to an end is okey. In the last year in my home city a number of possibly mentally unbalanced persons were accused of really horrible acts against kids, in some cases their own kids. One family locked the kids in wire animal cages, another locked a girl in a bathroom for months with almost no food. Religious zealots refused medical care for their child and substituted prayer and the girl died. But none of these terrible cases involved sexual acts so, incredibly, the punishments were not severe, even though actual and terrible physical and mental harm resulted to the children. But let an individual, clearly unbalanced, simply LOOK at a picture which may be a fabrication, and the cry goes up to lynch him. Maybe I’m alone on this, but I truly feel that before we worry what somebody is leering at, we should be working to stop the bruised and bloody kids, get the bone breaking adults locked up, stop the systematic physical battery against kids who cannot fight back. Of course its easier to rouse the mob against a person with a detestable lifestyle than a “spare the rod and spoil the child” old fashioned disciplinarian. Just my opinion. I realise others may feel otherwise.
February 26th, 2010 at 10:34 pm
I can’t see how anybody can defend this not even bleeding heart liberals.
GET A ROPE.
Firing squad.
Public execution………..
February 27th, 2010 at 12:02 am
^^^^@RW^^^^ Better, take his ass out to an old abandoned barn somewhere,
nail his dick to the loft floor, pour gas all over the place and light a match!
February 27th, 2010 at 1:05 am
^^^ Not to be labeled a bleeding heart liberal, but he’s obviously sick, severely sick in the head.
Instead of hearing voices or urges to hit women or urges to kill or cut himself or shoot drugs, he has strong urges to view or think ill of small children.
People often think that it’s some sort of pleasure on the same level as watching a movie or drinking a beer or eating a pie. Not even close! It’s not even a nicotine fit. To these people it is more like a heroin fit.
They are actually messed up, not just making bad decisions and don’t feel like changing to be “normal.” Odds are they were molested as a child.
While this guy gets off on pictures of small children, others get off on beating and mutilating humans or animals. Would you not want to nail those people to a floor and light the place up too?
You can’t equate pedophilia with a bank robber, but you can with a junky.
February 27th, 2010 at 6:21 am
Jon, you are absolutely right. If this guy is guilty in any way, shape or form , I would actually advocate fitting this scum up for the biggest fall possible. People like this who ruin our children never play by the rules of decency so why should we? I for one would relish the opportunity of spending 10 mins with this evil creature, thoroughly breaking the law constantly for every second i’m there
February 27th, 2010 at 6:20 pm
The vast majority of child-porn cases involve simple possession of contraband material downloaded from the internet. The crime of “child” “pornography” (as it used to be called) can include everything from possession of photographs of primitive African tribes to cartoon characters.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/bart-lisa-cartoon-is-ruled-kid-porn/story-e6frg6o6-1111118260908
February 28th, 2010 at 8:29 am
Ok, what the hell did I say this time that got my comment deleted???
Am I not allowed to express a dissenting opinion?
My post was on-topic, was NOT trolling in any way, shape or form, wasn’t spam and didn’t attack anyone else.
So what unwritten, super-secret rule did I supposedly break this time?
February 28th, 2010 at 10:18 am
^^Deleted? Or in moderation because of more than one link in your post?
February 28th, 2010 at 11:41 am
Lets get down to the nitty gritty here, did the man have material of this sort and was he aware its illegal to do so, thats the core of the offence and if he was aware it was an offence did he further spread the material to others ?
If the answer was yes then all emotional or off-topic rant about internet privacy aside he is guilty and should receive a substantial sentence.
I wouldnt like myself to be abused let alone suffer an innocent child/infant to have to do so, thats all there is to say.
February 28th, 2010 at 12:43 pm
A “dissenting opinion” in a post on “One of the world’s most horrifying online child pornography channels has been uncovered in Denmark”?
Hmmmmm
Anyway, I don’t remember your post in particular and since you’re anonymous, I have no way of telling what you’re talking about.
But I’ll tell you this — I’ve had several posts virtually supporting the idea of allowing kiddie posts, as long as they’re between adults and not up for public view. Stuff like that. And they got trashed.
A lot of stuff gets slagged as kiddie porn when it’s entirely innocent, and I’ve posted on that — ie, http://www.p2pnet.net/story/29285. But IMHO, it’s a very thin line.
Maybe Akismet got your post and I didn’t even see it, which is entirely possible. If there’s a lot in the (sometimes unfathomable) spam ‘hold’ list, I don’t have time to go through it all so I just delete. Or if your post looked to be in some way excusing child pornography, I’d have dumped it.
So if it was the former, sorry, and if the latter, no apology is necessary.
Cheers!
February 28th, 2010 at 11:05 pm
“Maybe Akismet got your post and I didn’t even see it, which is entirely possible. If there’s a lot in the (sometimes unfathomable) spam ‘hold’ list, I don’t have time to go through it all so I just delete. Or if your post looked to be in some way excusing child pornography, I’d have dumped it.”
The gist of my post was that I didn’t like the way most people today seem to be ready to drag someone out and lynch them for having downloaded child porn, even if they’ve never touched a child in their lives.
February 28th, 2010 at 11:37 pm
I haven’t been around in a while but I’m glad you’re still here. As a long time follower of your site, I have noticed that there are users that stand up for the most disgusting and horrible acts imaginable in the RWs. While it is possible that the authors believe what they are writing, in which case may they burn in hell, I believe that they are our shills trying to discredit this site and its proponents, may they also burn in hell.
I’m glad Jon has decided to delete their crap so it doesn’t reflect badly upon the rest of us.
February 28th, 2010 at 11:58 pm
Although due to extreme social stigma most of us will never knowingly run across one in our everyday lives, the anonymity of the Internet was like a cattle call that got the pedos spilling out of the shadows, shameless and emboldened. Most aren’t stupid enough to openly post something plainly illegal, but it seems a lot like to hover in the grey area. Things that aren’t quite illegal, but are definitely tasteless. Or are there really ‘normal’ people who might have an appetite for 1000-pic collections of preteen “models” in provocative or suggestive poses?
hXXp://thepiratebay.org/torrent/4589116/Magazine_Fashion_27__Should_TPB_delete_child_model_torrents_
hXXp://forum.suprbay.org/showthread.php?tid=16773
Plenty of complaints that because this material is non-copyrighted and doesn’t (illegally) cross the line, torrent site admins should not only allow it, but even create a kind of “pedo” category to make it easier to find. A hot topic for sure.
Or should we be relieved they’re spending their time at a computer instead of (gasp!) a playground?
March 1st, 2010 at 12:50 pm
I suggest not following the “Magazine Fashion” link in Dupe’s post; there’s something hauntingly broken about an image there. (Jon, if you remove that link, remove this too.)
April 29th, 2010 at 9:11 am
whether it is a sick mind, an evil heartless monster or a supporter of all freedoms… leave children alone! Those that are not able to care for themselves, protect themselves, or even the opportunity to say “not with MY body” should never ever be approached in any sexual manner. Two consenting adults. That is a moral code. Live it!