Welcome to p2pnet.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
REGISTER | LOGIN
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
Reviews
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Products
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
Kids and Kartels
Scroogle Search: 
Search
 
Web p2pnet   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
    Sponsored by
Frostwire
 
p2pnet
 


mp3rocket
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code

Big 4 labels forced Apple into iTunes LP

p2pnet view Music:- Apparently there’s some kind of iTunes LP thingie out there.

Who knew?

But it is/was a non-event and now Apple spinsters are having to make sure it doesn’t get the blame.

It’s all the fault of Vivendi Universal, EMI, Warner Music and Sony Music, says GigaOm.

The Big 4 talked poor old Apple into it, says the story.

Codenamed Cocktail and “introduced at a ‘rock and roll event’ in San Francisco” it “promised to give consumers a new reason to buy albums instead of individual songs”, it says , going on >>>

“Offering expanded cover art, lyrics, videos, animation and other digital goodies, iTunes LP was intended to evoke the feeling of spinning an LP record and holding the jacket in your hands. Especially when paired with a tablet computer (then rumored, now real) that would provide a new way to view large-format art, consumers were promised a digital experience that mimicked a physical one.”

It’s somewhat ironic that the very company that atomized the album in order to sell individual tracks -– one of many causes for the music industry’s decade-long tailspin –- has encouraged the rebundling of songs with iTunes LP. But I’m told by an industry source who preferred to remain anonymous that iTunes LP wasn’t Apple’s idea in the first place. Rather, it’s the result of the same renegotiations between Apple and the major record labels that yielded DRM-free songs and flexible pricing early last year, a concession by Cupertino to make a gesture in favor of album sales as consumers increasingly show a preference for digital singles.

“Neither Apple nor anyone else I spoke with was able to break out sales figures, but sources in various parts of the music industry agreed that the financial impact of iTunes LP on record sales has been tiny, if it’s had any effect at all”, the story adds.

Follow p2pnet on Twitter

..… and identi.ca


First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win ~ Mahatma Gandhi

GigaOm – Apple’s iTunes LP 6 Months Later: LP What?, March 9, 2010


Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. Subscribe to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/feed


Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details. Click here to learn what technologies might help you bypass censorshiop in your area.

HOME

One Response to “Big 4 labels forced Apple into iTunes LP”

  1. Devil's Advocate Says:

    “it’s the result of the same renegotiations between Apple and the major record labels that yielded DRM-free songs and flexible pricing early last year, a concession by Cupertino to make a gesture in favor of album sales as consumers increasingly show a preference for digital singles.”

    OR…
    There’s more than 1 “Pink-Floyd-style” contract being broken right now by the sales of singles, and this kind of action is an attempt to bundle the tracks back together and minimize the breach.

Leave a Reply

ONLY items referencing the post at hand, please. No links to personal sites, no personal attacks, trolling, freebie advertising, or off-topic posts. Thanks. And Cheers!

    Sponsored by
tek savvy