Delete infringing content, isoHunt ordered
p2pnet view MPAA:- Canada’s isoHunt has been ordered by a US judge to “remove all infringing content” and founder Gary Fung says the decision “would likely shutter the site”, according to Wired.
Fung runs the site from Vancouver, BC, and late last year, “With the news MiniNova has abandoned its traditional indexing service, now working only with Content Distribution, “That leaves you as probably the only major, and true, indexing site online,” said p2pnet.
“Do you expect to be able to to continue for the foreeeable future?” – we asked Gary at the time. “Nothing’s changed as far as we are concerned,” he said.
But now Fung and Hollywood’s MPAA are “haggling over how to comport with March 23 injunction issued by U.S. District Judge Stephen Wilson in Los Angeles” says Wired, going on >>>
“It is axiomatic that the availability of free infringing copies of plaintiffs’ works through defendants’ websites irreparably undermines the growing legitimate market (.pdf) for consumers to purchase access to the same works,” Wilson wrote in support of his injunction.
The judge added that “upwards of 95 percent of all dot-torrent files downloaded from defendants’ websites” return infringing material or works “at least highly likely to be infringing.”
Fung has two weeks to comply “within 14 days of the MPAA providing Fung a list of content to be removed”, says the story, adding:
“The judge is demanding that Isohunt cease “creating, maintaining or providing access to browsable website categories of dot-torrent or similar files using or based on infringement-related terms.”
“That’s jargon for keyword searching. ‘Filtering against keywords. It amounts to nothing less than taking down our search engine,’ Fung said in a telephone interview.”
“Fung’s position is that the Digital Millennium Copyright Act requires Hollywood to provide links to files to be removed. Keyword searches, he said, could scoop up non-infringing works.
“ ‘We’re discussing the mechanics, the process that is reasonable for an injunction,” Fung said. “We’re still trying to hope that the judge will do the right thing’.”
Wil the demand indeed “shutter” isoHunt?
We’ve asked Gary if that’s the case.
Stay tuned.

..… and identi.ca
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win ~ Mahatma Gandhi
Wired – Isohunt Ordered to Remove Infringing Content, March 30, 2010
traditional indexing service - MiniNova deletes copyright torrents, November 26, 2009
p2pnet – MiniNova down, but isoHunt lives on, November 27, 2009
Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. Subscribe to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/feed
Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details. Click here to learn what technologies might help you bypass censorship in your area.





March 31st, 2010 at 12:00 pm
Where there’s a void there’ll be something to fill it…
March 31st, 2010 at 1:34 pm
Like the Hydra, they cut off one head, two more will grow…
March 31st, 2010 at 1:36 pm
And three more pop up in its place.
March 31st, 2010 at 2:59 pm
Um… IsoHunt is run in Canada, right?
How can a US judge tell him what to do?
Did I miss something about Canada becoming part of the United States?
March 31st, 2010 at 3:12 pm
With Mininova, the court and website were in the same country. It was within the court’s jurisdiction. So how does a U.S. Court’s decision have any bearing on a Canadian website, well outside of their jurisdiction? The DMCA is quoted but does not apply there.
March 31st, 2010 at 4:48 pm
I wonder if there is a way to make the main site inaccessible to traditional browsing, yet allow only Google search to still list the torrents ?
Yah I know, I’m stupid, flame away.
March 31st, 2010 at 4:55 pm
Yes, it is possible.
March 31st, 2010 at 6:10 pm
This stinks of BS to me, last I heard the stinkin nasty laws I’m forced to live with are not applicable to people/webites/companies outside the FU USofA!! They need to tell the judge to bugger off, as our British
friends would say!
March 31st, 2010 at 9:48 pm
@Russel
I agree. Fung should give them the finger and tell the US to block it.
Fuck em. Let the US be the net-nanny of their own citizens and tell them what they can’t and can’t do and block it. Lets see their citizens reaction to being filtered.
But, alas, I think its more complicated than that…
April 1st, 2010 at 12:08 pm
” Yes, it is possible. ”
I thought as much.
Wouldn’t it be very interesting if torrent sites simply went off the grid, allowing ONLY search engines to
turn up individual results. Would Google, Yahoo, Bing, and other search engines then be forced to remove access to
certain keyword searches ? Imagine if that were to happen.
Google forced to block searches for Kanye, Diddy ..etc, thus making it impossible for anyone to search for ANYTHING
relating to precious corporate product, including fan sites and legit content
I played around a bit with Rocket Torrents and it appeared that Rocket was attempting to do just that.
That is .. removing the need for websites to host torrents on visible web pages. It’s a very interesting
direction.