<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Evelyn and the RIAA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/3786/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/3786</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:56:06 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/3786/comment-page-1#comment-9414</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2005 20:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-9414</guid>
		<description>How can anyone take these articles seriously when &quot;fair use&quot; isn&#039;t even spelled correctly?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can anyone take these articles seriously when &#8220;fair use&#8221; isn&#8217;t even spelled correctly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/3786/comment-page-1#comment-9393</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2005 06:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-9393</guid>
		<description>The most contrary thing is the RIAA keeps complaining about p2p filesharing loses them money and HOW THEIR HEART JUSTS BLEEDS FOR ALL OF THAT LOST ROYALTY COMPENSATION FOR THE ARTISTS THAT ARE SIGNED TO THEIR RECORD LABELS.


 OH PLEASE................... 

Does anybody who are recording artists ever remember the time when they started in the music business and went door to door to every music label they could find with their music catalogue and they  COULD NOT EVEN GIVE THEIR FUCKING WORTHLESS MUSIC AWAY JUST TO GET THE EXPOSURE ?


DO THEY EVER REMEMBER PLAYING IN SLEAZY NIGHTCLUBS OR OTHER DIVES YEAR AFTER YEAR TILL GOT THEIR &quot; BIG BREAK &quot; ?

 Or all of the times they literally or otherwise got fucked by their record agents or by their greedy record labels.

  It&#039;s about maximum greed in the record industry BABY !!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most contrary thing is the RIAA keeps complaining about p2p filesharing loses them money and HOW THEIR HEART JUSTS BLEEDS FOR ALL OF THAT LOST ROYALTY COMPENSATION FOR THE ARTISTS THAT ARE SIGNED TO THEIR RECORD LABELS.</p>
<p> OH PLEASE&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;. </p>
<p>Does anybody who are recording artists ever remember the time when they started in the music business and went door to door to every music label they could find with their music catalogue and they  COULD NOT EVEN GIVE THEIR FUCKING WORTHLESS MUSIC AWAY JUST TO GET THE EXPOSURE ?</p>
<p>DO THEY EVER REMEMBER PLAYING IN SLEAZY NIGHTCLUBS OR OTHER DIVES YEAR AFTER YEAR TILL GOT THEIR &#8221; BIG BREAK &#8221; ?</p>
<p> Or all of the times they literally or otherwise got fucked by their record agents or by their greedy record labels.</p>
<p>  It&#8217;s about maximum greed in the record industry BABY !!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/3786/comment-page-1#comment-9391</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2005 04:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-9391</guid>
		<description>The battle of corporate profit margins vs common sense.  The industry is not losing money, the fear is losing out on potential profits.  For this, common sense shows that this industry acts like a monopoly.  The lawsuits are in civil courts when the industry should be on trial for violation of anti trust laws.

New technology evolved before the industry could catch up.  Now with the lawsuits and trials to hold back p2p developer adavnces are aimed for the industry to copy the technology and try to generate a profit.


Again, the industry never really lost money. They lost out on being the first to develop the technology, hence they lost out on potential profits.  How can one be sued for damages unknown???

ln_solitude</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The battle of corporate profit margins vs common sense.  The industry is not losing money, the fear is losing out on potential profits.  For this, common sense shows that this industry acts like a monopoly.  The lawsuits are in civil courts when the industry should be on trial for violation of anti trust laws.</p>
<p>New technology evolved before the industry could catch up.  Now with the lawsuits and trials to hold back p2p developer adavnces are aimed for the industry to copy the technology and try to generate a profit.</p>
<p>Again, the industry never really lost money. They lost out on being the first to develop the technology, hence they lost out on potential profits.  How can one be sued for damages unknown???</p>
<p>ln_solitude</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
