<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New iPod to sport colour screen?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/3958/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/3958</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/3958/comment-page-1#comment-10176</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2005 02:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-10176</guid>
		<description>gracias : )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gracias : )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/3958/comment-page-1#comment-10175</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2005 01:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-10175</guid>
		<description>excerpt from Register article....

&quot;An excellent example of an Apple leak came in mid-September when details of the upcoming Jaguar update were &#039;accidentally&#039; posted on its support pages and removed within hours - after everybody had time to read them. These leaks must reduce any claim for damages or retribution that may come from Apple.&quot;

from,
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/12/16/apple_sues_powermac_web_leaker/
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>excerpt from Register article&#8230;.</p>
<p>&#8220;An excellent example of an Apple leak came in mid-September when details of the upcoming Jaguar update were &#8216;accidentally&#8217; posted on its support pages and removed within hours &#8211; after everybody had time to read them. These leaks must reduce any claim for damages or retribution that may come from Apple.&#8221;</p>
<p>from,<br />
<a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/12/16/apple_sues_powermac_web_leaker/" rel="nofollow">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/12/16/apple_sues_powermac_web_leaker/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/3958/comment-page-1#comment-10172</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2005 00:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-10172</guid>
		<description>Hey TT:

Really? Where did you see this?

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey TT:</p>
<p>Really? Where did you see this?</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/3958/comment-page-1#comment-10171</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2005 00:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-10171</guid>
		<description>&quot;Will we soon be seeing another Apple law suit launched against Think Secrets? Or have Steve &amp; Co finally realized âleaksâ such as this make great, cost-free advance PR and will it therefore soon announce they&#039;re dropping the suit against Ciarelli?&quot;

Haven&#039;t they been called out on the fact that have leaked items on their own website on purpose then yanked it just to cause a stir?  Seems like they already do it.

TT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Will we soon be seeing another Apple law suit launched against Think Secrets? Or have Steve &#038; Co finally realized âleaksâ such as this make great, cost-free advance PR and will it therefore soon announce they&#8217;re dropping the suit against Ciarelli?&#8221;</p>
<p>Haven&#8217;t they been called out on the fact that have leaked items on their own website on purpose then yanked it just to cause a stir?  Seems like they already do it.</p>
<p>TT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


