p2pnet World Headlines: May 15, 2010
Time Warner Cable tries to put brakes on massive piracy case Ars Technic
Time Warner Cable has no intention of complying with thousands of requests asking it to identify copyright infringers. Remember the US Copyright Group? They’re the DC legal outfit that is turning P2P copyright infringement into cash, partnering with independent movie studios (the big players are not involved) to sue individual file-swappers in federal court—and ISPs are not pleased with the plan. Yesterday, Time Warner Cable told a federal court overseeing a massive 2,094-person lawsuit targeting the poor folks who downloaded (and, what’s worse, apparently watched) Uwe Boll’s Far Cry that the US Copyright Group’s subpoenas were out of control. [Also see Hurt Locker in new file share farce ]
Conroy goes unopposed in TV filtering debate Computerworld
The vice-chair of the Electronic Frontiers Association has laughed off being snubbed by Channel 7’s Sunrise program for a segment on net filtering with the communications minister, Senator Stephen Conroy. Despite being invited to participate Geordie Guy told Computerworld Australia that he was asked not to come on to the show at the last minute due to a request from the minister. “I got called by Sunrise yesterday asking to come on the show tomorrow morning [14 May], but at the last second it appears that Senator Conroy wanted to speak just by himself,” he said.
Merciless website exposes Facebook indiscretions Toronto Star
A new website is exposing embarrassing and potentially job-threatening Facebook messages posted by users who probably don’t realize their privacy settings are turned off. There are posts with people brazenly admitting to playing hooky from work and others pull no punches in making fun of their bosses. Some are of a very personal nature, falling into the category of too much information. The founders of FacebookSearch, which started Thursday, say they have no malicious intentions and simply hope to show naive Facebook users that there are real consequences to not guarding their privacy online. “Facebook privacy has been gradually eroding . . . and I try to tell my friends, ‘Hey, you’ve got to be careful. Basically, unless you go through all these byzantine steps, your stuff is public,” said Will Moffat, a 29-year-old programmer from San Francisco. “You tell people but they just don’t get it and so I thought we’ve got to come up with a way to really show people something they can actually understand.”
Rochdale men jailed for iTunes gift voucher scam BBC
Five Rochdale men have been jailed for using iTunes music gift vouchers to launder money in an internet scam. The men used stolen credit card numbers to buy £750,000 worth of vouchers to sell at cheaper prices through eBay. They were caught when police stopped one of the men during a search at Hull port in 2007 and seized his laptop. It led them to orchestrator Suhail Tufail, 26, who admitted fraud charges and was jailed for five years at Manchester Crown Court. In May 2007, Humberside Ports police stopped three men – including Mohammed Arfan Rasool and Imran Aslam – as part of a routine search when they arrived from Amsterdam.
Cellphones Now Used More for Data Than for Calls New York Times
Liza Colburn and her 12-year-old daughter, Abigail, use their cellphones for many tasks, but make relatively few phone calls. She taps out her grocery lists, records voice memos, listens to music at the gym, tracks her caloric intake and posts frequent updates to her Twitter and Facebook accounts. The one thing she doesn’t use her cellphone for? Making calls. “I probably only talk to someone verbally on it once a week,” said Mrs. Colburn, a 40-year-old marketing consultant in Canton, Mass., who has an iPhone. For many Americans, cellphones have become irreplaceable tools to manage their lives and stay connected to the outside world, their families and networks of friends online. But increasingly, by several measures, that does not mean talking on them very much.
Cougar gal gagged by Google QMI Agency
Claudia Opdenkelder, the founder of Cougarlife.com, suddenly has run into opposition from Google which has banned advertising by sites that link older women with younger men. Cougars are an endangered species on Google. I mean the ones wearing fur. Faux fur, usually, and Chanel and Gucci. The common two-legged cougar.“This is an insult to women everywhere,” fumes Toronto cougar queen Claudia Opdenkelder, 39. “I’m shocked.” Ms Opdenkelder’s knickers are in a knot because Google has suddenly banned advertising by sites that link older women (cougars) to younger men (cubs).

..
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win ~ Mahatma Gandhi
May, 2010
Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. Subscribe to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/feed
Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details. Click here to learn what technologies might help you bypass censorship in your area.





May 16th, 2010 at 2:44 am
well, well…
Jesse Federm, director of international trade and intellectual property, Business Software Alliance, Washington, D.C. SEZ (paraphrased):
Canada’s placement on the U.S. Trade Representative’s priority watch list of countries with inadequate levels of intellectual property rights (IPR) isn’t due to software piracy or computer thought crimes, but rather due to counterfeiting at the border.
So umm, why is ACTA attacking home computer users?
Why is the entertainment industry attacking home computer users?
Why is the conservative government in Canada attacking home computer users?
Why was the copyright board of Canada putting out bullshit reports attacking home computer users, and allowed its reports to be written by the very people who funded it?
Why is CRIA, SOCAN, MPAA, BSA, RIAA, USTR et al. attacking home computer users?
Jesse Federm, director of international trade and intellectual property, Business Software Alliance, Washington, D.C. said (paraphrased), Canada will remain on the watch list even though it’s fictional piracy stats are down, and even if it gets better.
How will minister Moore & harper reply to this revelation by the BSA? Will they please their industry friends and “funders” just for shits and giggles at our expense, even though they just said it’s not about software piracy and home users and never was?
May 16th, 2010 at 7:33 pm
http://rabble.ca/blogs/bloggers/ericmang/2010/05/christian-right-and-its-influence-public-square
Right-wing Christian fundamentalism is now pervasive in Canadian politics.
With that comes “debates” like “creationism vs evolution”, “abortion vs pro-life” and general retardedness.
May 17th, 2010 at 12:28 am
Metal God Ronnie James Dio dead
Ronnie James Dio, lead singer of Black Sabbath, Dio, Rainbow dies at 67
http://music-mix.ew.com/2010/05/16/ronnie-james-dio-lead-singer-of-black-sabbath-dio-rainbow-dies-at-67/
May 17th, 2010 at 1:01 am
Are concert ticket fees a rip-off?
So, you want to go see Jon Bon Jovi at the new Meadowlands Stadium next week, but don’t want to shell out $350 or $500 for the best seats?
If you’re willing to settle for a nosebleed seat in the arena, you can see him for just $36.50, according to the Ticketmaster website.
Well, $36.50 plus a $3 facility charge, a $7.90 “convenience charge,” a $4 order processing fee and a $2.50 charge to print the ticket out at home. Tack on the extras and that cheap seat is now $53.90 — 48 percent more than the ticket’s face value. Is it a ripoff?
http://www.dailyrecord.com/article/20100516/OPINION/100515014/1005/NEWS01/Are+concert+ticket+fees+a+rip-off
May 17th, 2010 at 1:47 am
That Openbook website where facebook lulz can be had is http://willmoffat.github.com/FacebookSearch/
Searching for ‘rectal exam’ is pretty funny.
May 17th, 2010 at 4:58 am
“The Digital Millennium Copyright Act serves many purposes, some of which are good, but certain parts of it are ripe for abuse. The infamous DMCA takedown notice is at the top of anyone’s list of most-abused parts of the act. These notices are meant to make it easy for content owners to have violations removed, and they do. But the notices also make it easy for anyone to try and silence criticism or stifle angles they simply don’t like, even if the party in question is working perfectly within the confines of fair use.
Over the course of our coverage here at Ars, we’ve seen a number of DMCA takedown cases that were just plain lame. And, although there are plenty more lame cases that have happened in the world, we thought we would highlight some of our “favorite” ones to show how the DMCA takedown system can be used in an attempt to control content instead of merely enforcing copyrights. Plus, these examples just make us chuckle at the absurdity.”
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/05/five-examples-of-lame-dmca-takedowns.ars
May 17th, 2010 at 8:57 am
Gary McKinnon: ‘They can’t return me to a place I wasn’t in’
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/profiles/gary-mckinnon-they-cant-return-me-to-a-place-i-wasnt-in-1974573.html