Comments on: RIAA sues another 753 file sharers

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 03 Mar 2005 07:25:34 +0000

Google news “RIAA” has very little about this round of lawsuits.

Could it be that the news media is now losing interest in reporting this nonsense.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 02 Mar 2005 23:29:05 +0000

In accordance with the idea in article http://p2pnet.net/story/4023 ,
I hereby fine the R.I.A.A. $75300.00 . It looks like it will be quite a while before I buy anything from these thugs .

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 02 Mar 2005 21:38:40 +0000

thanks, I was a little over the top last night, but man I was seething….just getting tired of the lies being perpetrated to the general public, ignorant (greedy, possibly corrupt) politicians, AND how patently obvious it is when you look at it that the Record Companies are trying to perserve an outdated monopolisitic, anti-competitive (which they are exempt from anti-trust laws for gawds sake) business model that profits very few at the top, while doing so off of the labour, soul and emotion of others (namely the artists)….

the opportunity is here for a much more equitable, fair and moral system to be put in place, benefitting both the artists and consumer….but not the record co fat cats, and that is where their problem with this new empowerment of individual artists to distribute and promote their own material…CUT OUT THE USELESS, LEECHING MIDDLEMAN!

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 02 Mar 2005 19:28:40 +0000

Hi: I’ve noticed your posts before, and thanks for making the effort. Truly.

However, there’s ‘obscenity,’ which I axe if I see it (which isn’t always) and then there’s cursing out of sheer anger, which I leave alone ; )

Cheers!

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 02 Mar 2005 18:18:03 +0000

yup, id say well said

the distribution model should be destroied

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 02 Mar 2005 17:09:26 +0000

obscene language in post directly above!

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 02 Mar 2005 10:18:56 +0000

“Grokster, Kazaa and others also provide a legal and critical alternative for artists to distribute their material.”"

thats waht its all about, there can be no other distribution or promotional channel to rival the record companies, if there was, it would (like it is) show how morally corrupt and unfair the current system is…thats why big music wnats to crush P2P, not b/c of falling profits (we all know thats BS) but b/c of the possible competition that mthey may have to face…..

its a fucking travesty of economics and politics founded on a status qou of fat cat fucking baby boomers….

go to hell Big music, your days are numbered regardless, shitheads.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 02 Mar 2005 08:46:03 +0000

that’s ok. they’re welsome to 100% of all i have,

btw, i have nothing. so 100% of nothing is still nothing. they can have it. perhaps they’d also like to take care of my debts?

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 02 Mar 2005 01:52:33 +0000

it would be $30M

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 02 Mar 2005 01:30:35 +0000

hmmm, didn’t I read somewhere that the average settlment was $3000? That would mean they have extorted $3M?