Durst wants $80M for porn video
p2pnet.net News:- When news that Limp Bizkit’s Fred Durst appeared to have been the victim of Paris Hilton Hack Attack # 2, not too many people were all that excited.
In fact, as Gawker expressed it, “some fool has taken it upon himself to ‘leak’ a sex tape starring the one person you’d never want to see in a sex tape,” going on:
“If you’re feeling masochistic, hate life, and have given up on God, you’re welcome to watch for yourself. Fred Durst On Film [extremely NSFW, but now spyware/virus free]“
Say no more.
Actually, say more because Durst is now suing Gawker and other web sites for a total of $80 million for showing the clip.
Now let’s see, using the formula if X=$ and Y=inches …
Anyhow, secret Service agents looking into Paris Hilton’s cell phone hacking are also conducting, “an elaborate investigation” into the Durst incident, says the New York Daily News.
Popdoh is another site named, and it says, ““Fred, if you read this, let me tell you it won’t change much. Now the entire world knows ……..”
Something you think we should know? tips[at]p2pnet.net
===================
See:-
Gawker – The Fred Durst Sex Tape You Never Wanted, February 25, 2005
New York Daily News – Durst seeks 80M Bizkits in Net sex vid, March 5, 2005
Popdoh – Fred Durst Sues Popdoh!, March 7, 2005
March 7th, 2005 at 9:03 pm
lol, what a fool, at one time I thought he may have been pulling a Paris Hilton – meaning, intentional leaks of info, video etc etc to boost their no-talent celebutante careers(?)
while I’m still thinking that about Paris (and getting tired of her BS and obvious PR ploys) I’m now thinking Durst may actually be a victim, well beyond him already being a victim if you know what I mean.
TT
March 8th, 2005 at 4:15 am
Looks like FRED has a Hard On against these web sites!!!!!
March 8th, 2005 at 7:38 am
Anyone that records themselves having sex and does not maintain complete control of the sole copy of that material is not a victim. They are a fool. On an aside. Same goes with webcams, if you get nekked on cam, assume you are being recorded. Because you are!
In short, dont go around complaining that you been wronged if you made a giant f***ing mistake.
March 9th, 2005 at 1:57 am
Part of suit was IP Related. Did Durst Copyright his sex tape?
March 9th, 2005 at 7:58 pm
he’s still a victim of his own existence…and a fool to boot
TT
December 6th, 2006 at 1:59 am