Comments on: Durst wants $80M for porn video

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 06 Dec 2006 06:59:06 +0000

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 10 Mar 2005 00:58:33 +0000

he’s still a victim of his own existence…and a fool to boot

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 09 Mar 2005 06:57:41 +0000

Part of suit was IP Related. Did Durst Copyright his sex tape?

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Tue, 08 Mar 2005 12:38:09 +0000

Anyone that records themselves having sex and does not maintain complete control of the sole copy of that material is not a victim. They are a fool. On an aside. Same goes with webcams, if you get nekked on cam, assume you are being recorded. Because you are!

In short, dont go around complaining that you been wronged if you made a giant f***ing mistake.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Tue, 08 Mar 2005 09:15:03 +0000

Looks like FRED has a Hard On against these web sites!!!!!

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Tue, 08 Mar 2005 02:03:46 +0000

lol, what a fool, at one time I thought he may have been pulling a Paris Hilton – meaning, intentional leaks of info, video etc etc to boost their no-talent celebutante careers(?)

while I’m still thinking that about Paris (and getting tired of her BS and obvious PR ploys) I’m now thinking Durst may actually be a victim, well beyond him already being a victim if you know what I mean.