Is the Arizona case different?
p2pnet.net News:- “A month ago I commented on the two men sentenced to 5 years in prison for distributing pirated music, movies, and software over file-sharing networks in Another Milestone Against Piracy,” writes Princeton University student Brian Shiau on his blog.
“These individuals appeared to be central to the piracy process, ripping digital content and distributing it online.”
But what sparked his newest post was the story centering on the University of Arizona student for “possession of pirated movies and music” worth (wait for it) $50,000,000.
Read on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Deterring piracy steps up to a whole other level
By Brian Shiau – Shiau Street, a tech + stocks blog
This criminal conviction really hits home as it could happen to any one of us. But will this change anything? Back in 2003, an undergraduate student here at Princeton was sued by the RIAA for creating a search engine for piracy. He ultimately settled somewhere north of $10,000. This legal action shut down all the student made search engines and deterred many students from sharing pirated content over the school’s network. However, this did not stop piracy on campus. Students continued to use file sharing programs like Kazaa and BitTorent applications. A student by the nick name “Jiller” created a DC++ network that was supposed to be hidden from the administration but was recently shut down.
I believe this recent criminal suit is different. First, this time the wrong doing was not about setting up a network or distributing massive amounts of pirated content. This time the individual was punished for possession–something many people think will not get them in trouble.
College students don’t have much money to start with. Any money they lose to an RIAA settlement is coming from their parents anyways. With criminal punishments, the college student actually has to pay the price for his wrong doing. He can’t send his parents to prison in his place.
Additionally, few if anyone is ever punished because the law makes it too difficult for the RIAA to file suit. But enforcement by the government certainly changes things. No longer is big business picking on the little guy but the government is punishing wrongdoers for what they are doing wrong: stealing. I generally don’t like to look to the government to instill morality but sadly, government crackdown is often what is necessary for people to realize that something is wrong. Of course, the prime purpose of government for the past 6,000 years has been to protect life and property.
In my ideal fantasy world, parents teach their children morality at an early age. They teach their children the value of hard work and the necessity to exchange value for value rather than steal. I whole-heartedly believe that America is a nation built on innovation, but this can only continue if we as Americans recognize the value innovative individuals bring to the market.
=====================
Something you think we should know? tips[at]p2pnet.net
===================
See:-
$50,000,000 – RIAA nails U of Arizona student, p2pnet, March 8, 2005
FBI agents – FBI raids Arizona schools, p2pnet, April 22, 2004






March 8th, 2005 at 8:04 pm
ok he got in trouble for selling material nowwhere in the article did it ever mention that.
March 8th, 2005 at 8:09 pm
Are you off your rocker? The Supreme Court has made it abundantly clear that copyright infringement and theft are very different!!
March 8th, 2005 at 8:38 pm
doesnt say it in the areizona story either
March 8th, 2005 at 11:05 pm
Perhaps Brian should stick to making comments about tech stocks since it is
clear that is main goal in life is to make a pile of money working for a fortune 500
company. Those of us who have been following the issues with p2p for a little longer find his arguments cursory and his comments arrogant like most Princetonians.
March 9th, 2005 at 12:26 am
Posted by Overnet
Here’s a thought, charge $10.00 flat rate (legal for anything no caps) and we would be interested.
March 9th, 2005 at 12:47 pm
i’m free to quote an other reader. a very important fact is missing, he was sentenced for trying to sell. the link below guides you to the originial comment including details on the exact law that was applied.
http://p2pnet.net/index.php?page=comment&story=4143&comment=10879
March 9th, 2005 at 5:35 pm
I like the part about parents teaching their children about morality. I plan on teaching my children it is wrong to accept bribes (opps I mean donations) to change laws to suit corporations. Also that it is wrong to exploit other peoples work for your $ benefit. How about the overcharging for products because you have no competition as you bought legislation that makes it impossible to compete, is that morally right?
Oh and don’t get me started on the hard work part…. I plan on teaching them the definition of hard work is not, to work hard for a really short period of time then sit on your ass collecting royalties from the copyright/patent.