<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Music File Share Top Ten</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4152/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4152</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4152/comment-page-1#comment-10971</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 03:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-10971</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s something to do with what radio stations they get played on. I would like to see an overhaul of the genres, as they don&#039;t make much sense to me at the moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s something to do with what radio stations they get played on. I would like to see an overhaul of the genres, as they don&#8217;t make much sense to me at the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4152/comment-page-1#comment-10969</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 02:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-10969</guid>
		<description>Why do the same songs sometimes show up in separate categories?  Are they counted twice in some way?  How does that work?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do the same songs sometimes show up in separate categories?  Are they counted twice in some way?  How does that work?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4152/comment-page-1#comment-10965</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-10965</guid>
		<description>	
The only &#039;albums&#039; I download in their entirety, these days, are usually ones with &#039;guaranteed&#039; content - Bach&#039;s Cello Suites, for example, or Mose Allison or Miles Davis or Stevie Wonder. Otherwise, I download single tracks. 

One of the reasons I stopped buying CDS, etc, years ago was because most of the tracks are dross. For me, nothing has changed in that respect, at least where 99% of current pop releases are concerned. 

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only &#8216;albums&#8217; I download in their entirety, these days, are usually ones with &#8216;guaranteed&#8217; content &#8211; Bach&#8217;s Cello Suites, for example, or Mose Allison or Miles Davis or Stevie Wonder. Otherwise, I download single tracks. </p>
<p>One of the reasons I stopped buying CDS, etc, years ago was because most of the tracks are dross. For me, nothing has changed in that respect, at least where 99% of current pop releases are concerned. </p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4152/comment-page-1#comment-10948</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-10948</guid>
		<description>&quot;Unfortunately for the music industry, more and more P2P users continue to graduate into the latter category&quot;

Agreed. Since I discovered Shareaza, and then BT, I have downloaded my music as albums 99% of the time, and I&#039;ve been showing friends how to do it too. So it&#039;s definately catching on, which is, of course, a good thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Unfortunately for the music industry, more and more P2P users continue to graduate into the latter category&#8221;</p>
<p>Agreed. Since I discovered Shareaza, and then BT, I have downloaded my music as albums 99% of the time, and I&#8217;ve been showing friends how to do it too. So it&#8217;s definately catching on, which is, of course, a good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4152/comment-page-1#comment-10936</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 06:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-10936</guid>
		<description>Napster created a class of P2P in which users would search for an MP3 and download it. It made no difference how many people shared the exact same file - each duplicate file was for all relevant purposes a unique file. Because interrupted downloads could not be resumed (let alone multi-sourced) using Napster, this necessitated the sharing of singles rather than single-file MP3 albums (which would later include Albumwrap).

Although all P2P networks since Napster allow for resuming interrupted downloads, and most support the sharing of all filetypes, the pattern of downloading primarily MP3 singles largely held over on these post-Napster networks. 

However, there were 2 other trends in P2P:

1. Edonkey2000 and BitTorrent allow widespread broadcasts of files, with file checksums posted on websites so that each unique file is typically downloaded by many people simultaneously. Since both networks were designed for broadcasting large files to many people, it was primarily albums - not MP3 singles - that were always the method of choice on these swarming P2P networks. Most of the audio files that are released are zipped or rar&#039;d albums containing not only the MP3s, but often playlists and scanned CD covers. 

2. Audio Galaxy allowed collections of files to be shared, so an album download could be easily compiled. Soulseek, Piolet, and other  P2Ps followed this trend.  

There is a primary difference between the MP3s shared as singles and in the form of albums. Singles are often created by novice computer users, ripped from their own CD collections. Using consumer-friendly software such as MusicMatch Jukebox - with its once-awful Xing encoder - these files are then quietly shared, and as a result, many different encodes of  the same song - most of poor quality - are available throughout the network. In its early days, Kazaa only allowed the sharing of 128 kbs-encoded mp3s, a decision presumably made in an attempt to placate the record industry during their pre-lawsuit days.

By contrast, the music  available on eDonkey and Bittorrent is usually high quality rips and encodes, typically using EAC and Lame - applications not designed for novice users. It was only more recently, due to the multi-network clients such as the new Morpheus, that MP3 singles even began appear on the ED2K network.

Although most casual music downloaders patronize singles - many people, after all, still use Kazaa -  members of the more &#039;elite&#039; P2P crowd tend to get their music in the form of albums. Unfortunately for the music industry, more and more P2P users continue to graduate into the latter category.

-tm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Napster created a class of P2P in which users would search for an MP3 and download it. It made no difference how many people shared the exact same file &#8211; each duplicate file was for all relevant purposes a unique file. Because interrupted downloads could not be resumed (let alone multi-sourced) using Napster, this necessitated the sharing of singles rather than single-file MP3 albums (which would later include Albumwrap).</p>
<p>Although all P2P networks since Napster allow for resuming interrupted downloads, and most support the sharing of all filetypes, the pattern of downloading primarily MP3 singles largely held over on these post-Napster networks. </p>
<p>However, there were 2 other trends in P2P:</p>
<p>1. Edonkey2000 and BitTorrent allow widespread broadcasts of files, with file checksums posted on websites so that each unique file is typically downloaded by many people simultaneously. Since both networks were designed for broadcasting large files to many people, it was primarily albums &#8211; not MP3 singles &#8211; that were always the method of choice on these swarming P2P networks. Most of the audio files that are released are zipped or rar&#8217;d albums containing not only the MP3s, but often playlists and scanned CD covers. </p>
<p>2. Audio Galaxy allowed collections of files to be shared, so an album download could be easily compiled. Soulseek, Piolet, and other  P2Ps followed this trend.  </p>
<p>There is a primary difference between the MP3s shared as singles and in the form of albums. Singles are often created by novice computer users, ripped from their own CD collections. Using consumer-friendly software such as MusicMatch Jukebox &#8211; with its once-awful Xing encoder &#8211; these files are then quietly shared, and as a result, many different encodes of  the same song &#8211; most of poor quality &#8211; are available throughout the network. In its early days, Kazaa only allowed the sharing of 128 kbs-encoded mp3s, a decision presumably made in an attempt to placate the record industry during their pre-lawsuit days.</p>
<p>By contrast, the music  available on eDonkey and Bittorrent is usually high quality rips and encodes, typically using EAC and Lame &#8211; applications not designed for novice users. It was only more recently, due to the multi-network clients such as the new Morpheus, that MP3 singles even began appear on the ED2K network.</p>
<p>Although most casual music downloaders patronize singles &#8211; many people, after all, still use Kazaa &#8211;  members of the more &#8216;elite&#8217; P2P crowd tend to get their music in the form of albums. Unfortunately for the music industry, more and more P2P users continue to graduate into the latter category.</p>
<p>-tm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4152/comment-page-1#comment-10916</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 23:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-10916</guid>
		<description>What IS an album? And how many people actually download every track?

With the Net, we&#039;re back to &#039;singles,&#039; so to speak.

Cheers! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What IS an album? And how many people actually download every track?</p>
<p>With the Net, we&#8217;re back to &#8217;singles,&#8217; so to speak.</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4152/comment-page-1#comment-10898</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 10:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-10898</guid>
		<description>It would be nice for albums to be included.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be nice for albums to be included.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


