By the way, much of the independent stuff out there sounds better than the stuff peddled by the cartels.

Is that the only response? There were more spelling and gramatical errors in my comment… why stop there?

Or is that the most valid reply you could give?

You mean Scalded!

I don’t think they’re doing too badly out of technologial innovation.

The unending bitching and moaning about the ‘evils’ of the MPAA and the RIAA has reached a point of absolute absurdity.

You (the consumer who believes the ‘PR hype’ put out by these organisations and their members) are foolish enough to want the crap their peddling. In subscribing to the machine and wanting their product you not only give them the power to behave like this, but a tick in the checkbox that they are getting ’stolen’ from. If you couldn’t download the file, you’d still want it and, therefore, quite possibly pay for it.

Stop buying the crap they feed you in trailers, marketing, print ads and we’ll all stop having to deal with the ‘legality’ of ‘wanting’ their product for the cost of an internet connection.

Digital Downloader’s who moan about the danger’s and restrictions organisations (like the two mentioned above) are trying to put on our internet usage are no better than folk who sue McDonald’s because they scolded themselves on obviously hot coffee.

Idiots.

They don’t understand that people don’t like being micromanaged by paranoid and disconnected corporations, and that they know they have rights to time shift, space shift, transform, duplicate, and format shift media so long as it’s in their own home.

Until they dump DRM there will be no parity between an itunes or crapster file and one comming from a p2p network.