<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Movies File Share Top Ten</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4247/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4247</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:23:46 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4247/comment-page-1#comment-11237</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2005 18:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-11237</guid>
		<description>Do you thihk I&#039;d let anything from the industry onto p2pnet, Dave? heh

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you thihk I&#8217;d let anything from the industry onto p2pnet, Dave? heh</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4247/comment-page-1#comment-11222</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2005 12:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-11222</guid>
		<description>If &#039;Big Chapagne&#039; really wanted to, they could show us more than the &#039;top ten&#039;. They could show us various trends over the years.
But I&#039;m sure that their hands are tied, and they&#039;re being coerced into posting the &#039;top ten&#039;, and nothing but the &#039;top ten&#039;.
With that fact, is what they publish believable?
Seeing as there is no way of actually &#039;knowing&#039; if a file has completed downloading (and on their site they admitted &#039;downloads&#039; and not complete files), the whole thing smells of record industry propaganda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If &#8216;Big Chapagne&#8217; really wanted to, they could show us more than the &#8216;top ten&#8217;. They could show us various trends over the years.<br />
But I&#8217;m sure that their hands are tied, and they&#8217;re being coerced into posting the &#8216;top ten&#8217;, and nothing but the &#8216;top ten&#8217;.<br />
With that fact, is what they publish believable?<br />
Seeing as there is no way of actually &#8216;knowing&#8217; if a file has completed downloading (and on their site they admitted &#8216;downloads&#8217; and not complete files), the whole thing smells of record industry propaganda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
