<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Movies File Share Top Ten</title>
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4247</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 05:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4247#comment-11237</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2005 18:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4247#comment-11237</guid>
		<description>Do you thihk I'd let anything from the industry onto p2pnet, Dave? heh

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you thihk I&#8217;d let anything from the industry onto p2pnet, Dave? heh</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4247#comment-11222</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2005 12:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4247#comment-11222</guid>
		<description>If 'Big Chapagne' really wanted to, they could show us more than the 'top ten'. They could show us various trends over the years.
But I'm sure that their hands are tied, and they're being coerced into posting the 'top ten', and nothing but the 'top ten'.
With that fact, is what they publish believable?
Seeing as there is no way of actually 'knowing' if a file has completed downloading (and on their site they admitted 'downloads' and not complete files), the whole thing smells of record industry propaganda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If &#8216;Big Chapagne&#8217; really wanted to, they could show us more than the &#8216;top ten&#8217;. They could show us various trends over the years.<br />
But I&#8217;m sure that their hands are tied, and they&#8217;re being coerced into posting the &#8216;top ten&#8217;, and nothing but the &#8216;top ten&#8217;.<br />
With that fact, is what they publish believable?<br />
Seeing as there is no way of actually &#8216;knowing&#8217; if a file has completed downloading (and on their site they admitted &#8216;downloads&#8217; and not complete files), the whole thing smells of record industry propaganda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
