<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Climate Change predictions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4270/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4270</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4270/comment-page-1#comment-11388</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 21:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-11388</guid>
		<description>Remember, there is a Creator (Yahweh).  He will correct things once it is proven that man cannot rule himself.  He gave specific rules which provided an environmentally friendly society.  He told us not to eat certain critters such as crabs, oysters, etc.  These unclean critters do much to consume the pollutants found in waters today.  Yes, these pollutants also grow bacteria that produces Green House gasses.

He also gave commandments dealing with the restoration of the land such as the Land Sabbath.  He also provided a way for the poor to be able to eat without placing a burden on society.  His rules about the transfer of land use, Jubilees, and debt also put a brake on the cartels growth of power at the expense of people.  His rules about the treatment of animals also promote the growth of the environment.  What these scientists state have been demonstrated many times in Scripture.  Only in Scripture, the environmental changes are called by other names.  The society that follows His rules is one that is proserous and does not destroy the environment.  Yahweh and Yeshua will   cause the worls to be restored once man begins to learn his lesson.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember, there is a Creator (Yahweh).  He will correct things once it is proven that man cannot rule himself.  He gave specific rules which provided an environmentally friendly society.  He told us not to eat certain critters such as crabs, oysters, etc.  These unclean critters do much to consume the pollutants found in waters today.  Yes, these pollutants also grow bacteria that produces Green House gasses.</p>
<p>He also gave commandments dealing with the restoration of the land such as the Land Sabbath.  He also provided a way for the poor to be able to eat without placing a burden on society.  His rules about the transfer of land use, Jubilees, and debt also put a brake on the cartels growth of power at the expense of people.  His rules about the treatment of animals also promote the growth of the environment.  What these scientists state have been demonstrated many times in Scripture.  Only in Scripture, the environmental changes are called by other names.  The society that follows His rules is one that is proserous and does not destroy the environment.  Yahweh and Yeshua will   cause the worls to be restored once man begins to learn his lesson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4270/comment-page-1#comment-11387</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 21:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-11387</guid>
		<description>There is only one conservative party i know of in America, and that is the Constitution Party  http://www.constitutionparty.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is only one conservative party i know of in America, and that is the Constitution Party  <a href="http://www.constitutionparty.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.constitutionparty.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4270/comment-page-1#comment-11383</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 18:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-11383</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t be afraid of death.
The earth will fix the problem in time.
Just take a deep breath and have patience !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t be afraid of death.<br />
The earth will fix the problem in time.<br />
Just take a deep breath and have patience !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4270/comment-page-1#comment-11353</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2005 08:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-11353</guid>
		<description>This is what gets me - people who will put their little comforts above their future and that of their family. I guess they really don&#039;t care about their kids future - they&#039;ll be dead and if they&#039;re lucky they won&#039;t be anywhere where they can hear the curses the next generations will lay on them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is what gets me &#8211; people who will put their little comforts above their future and that of their family. I guess they really don&#8217;t care about their kids future &#8211; they&#8217;ll be dead and if they&#8217;re lucky they won&#8217;t be anywhere where they can hear the curses the next generations will lay on them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4270/comment-page-1#comment-11352</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2005 07:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-11352</guid>
		<description>I agree. I&#039;ve done a fair amount of statistical research on temperature variation and while it&#039;s often possible to find larger naturally occuring variations to the ones we&#039;re experiencing there&#039;s also always been climatological or geological factors that affected. Global temperature levels do not flutctuate randomly. Only one of the university professors I worked with supported the &#039;natural variation&#039; theory and even he had to eventually backtrack for reason above. 

And another thing for all those &#039;suspicious&#039;of the scientific evidence: The people who claim that global warming is not man made or not a problem have certain things in common: (1) invariably they are in the pay of or directly funded by industries that have a lot to lose from environmental protection. (2) they consistently fail to mention that natural variation in temperatures can still be immensely dangerous (think of the ice age) and  they ignore the fact that our emmisions can affect this significantly. So let&#039;s say it&#039;s not our fault - insanely unlikely, but let&#039;s say. It&#039;s still our house that&#039;s burning. You can sit in there and say it&#039;s not your fault, or you can get a bucket of water and do something. (3) The number of  dissneters is steadfily going down as the evidence piles up. The latest study published a month ago, showed that temperature is rising quickly not just in the atmosphere but also in the ocen. There is no way that can happen without a genuine rise in the whole ecosystem&#039;s temperature. Oceanic temperatures do not vary easily like the atmosphere. They change very slowly and with great difficulty. This thing is real and if we don&#039;t wake up it&#039;s going to kill our grandchildren.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. I&#8217;ve done a fair amount of statistical research on temperature variation and while it&#8217;s often possible to find larger naturally occuring variations to the ones we&#8217;re experiencing there&#8217;s also always been climatological or geological factors that affected. Global temperature levels do not flutctuate randomly. Only one of the university professors I worked with supported the &#8216;natural variation&#8217; theory and even he had to eventually backtrack for reason above. </p>
<p>And another thing for all those &#8217;suspicious&#8217;of the scientific evidence: The people who claim that global warming is not man made or not a problem have certain things in common: (1) invariably they are in the pay of or directly funded by industries that have a lot to lose from environmental protection. (2) they consistently fail to mention that natural variation in temperatures can still be immensely dangerous (think of the ice age) and  they ignore the fact that our emmisions can affect this significantly. So let&#8217;s say it&#8217;s not our fault &#8211; insanely unlikely, but let&#8217;s say. It&#8217;s still our house that&#8217;s burning. You can sit in there and say it&#8217;s not your fault, or you can get a bucket of water and do something. (3) The number of  dissneters is steadfily going down as the evidence piles up. The latest study published a month ago, showed that temperature is rising quickly not just in the atmosphere but also in the ocen. There is no way that can happen without a genuine rise in the whole ecosystem&#8217;s temperature. Oceanic temperatures do not vary easily like the atmosphere. They change very slowly and with great difficulty. This thing is real and if we don&#8217;t wake up it&#8217;s going to kill our grandchildren.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4270/comment-page-1#comment-11350</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2005 03:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-11350</guid>
		<description>The USA President&#039;s ranch is &quot;greener&quot; than any left winger could imagine, a tree hugger&#039;s dream. Oil for the stupid masses, renewable for those in &quot;the know.&quot; These facts are never mentioned by the supposedly &quot;left wing&quot; press. &amp;, I am a conservative Republican, but a true 1 who knows Bush is not a true conservative, just wrong on damn near everything. Why do U think his whole cabinet has quit??????????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The USA President&#8217;s ranch is &#8220;greener&#8221; than any left winger could imagine, a tree hugger&#8217;s dream. Oil for the stupid masses, renewable for those in &#8220;the know.&#8221; These facts are never mentioned by the supposedly &#8220;left wing&#8221; press. &#038;, I am a conservative Republican, but a true 1 who knows Bush is not a true conservative, just wrong on damn near everything. Why do U think his whole cabinet has quit??????????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4270/comment-page-1#comment-11347</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2005 22:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-11347</guid>
		<description>You are mistaken. Ethanol is largely used here on Brazil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are mistaken. Ethanol is largely used here on Brazil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4270/comment-page-1#comment-11344</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2005 16:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-11344</guid>
		<description>I think you think he&#039;d better be joking, but I think naught.  WE are at a critical point.  This whole &quot;thing&quot; is unbelievable.  Now we are noticing oil prices going up, where have we all been over the last 30 years?  Now we are noticing the damage to the environment and may I add only when it affects &quot;us&quot; do we perk our ears.
I have always said that if we would only put our energy and resources into creating ways to use renewable resources will be have a chance on this planet, it would create jobs (hello) and it would give us a direction that might unite us as well as allow us to continue this experiment in humanity.  Amen,,,, and may i add cause and effect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you think he&#8217;d better be joking, but I think naught.  WE are at a critical point.  This whole &#8220;thing&#8221; is unbelievable.  Now we are noticing oil prices going up, where have we all been over the last 30 years?  Now we are noticing the damage to the environment and may I add only when it affects &#8220;us&#8221; do we perk our ears.<br />
I have always said that if we would only put our energy and resources into creating ways to use renewable resources will be have a chance on this planet, it would create jobs (hello) and it would give us a direction that might unite us as well as allow us to continue this experiment in humanity.  Amen,,,, and may i add cause and effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4270/comment-page-1#comment-11343</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2005 15:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-11343</guid>
		<description>Please, All of you remember only one person is in control, and he is very much alive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please, All of you remember only one person is in control, and he is very much alive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4270/comment-page-1#comment-11339</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2005 13:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-11339</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t agree more whole heartdly or honestly you pinned it to a tee and are obviously very up on or informed of the facts, 
as always keep up the front chin up like all of us NEED to do. This is America, free speech especially when warranted with expert correct findings is what we fought for from the time of the great revolt from the old world and the American Revolution and are constitution protects us to do what is right and it must be said and done in times of need, I commend you for writing such an accurate picture of how money is blood to the people who should know better and however are so lost in their lust of power and greed do not have the intelligence to believe in science what a SHAME ON THEM! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more whole heartdly or honestly you pinned it to a tee and are obviously very up on or informed of the facts,<br />
as always keep up the front chin up like all of us NEED to do. This is America, free speech especially when warranted with expert correct findings is what we fought for from the time of the great revolt from the old world and the American Revolution and are constitution protects us to do what is right and it must be said and done in times of need, I commend you for writing such an accurate picture of how money is blood to the people who should know better and however are so lost in their lust of power and greed do not have the intelligence to believe in science what a SHAME ON THEM!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4270/comment-page-1#comment-11338</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2005 13:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-11338</guid>
		<description>&gt;What a bunch of HOOEY!
&gt;It&#039;s not about weather, it&#039;s a well orchestrated campaign by weenie &gt;scientists who have more education than smarts to do away with &gt;automobiles. I challenge them to travel, do farm work, or tow a &gt;pleasure boat with an electric car.
&gt;These guys just don&#039;t live in the &quot;real&quot; world.

You are totally right.  In the early 50&#039;s a diabolical plan was created the the E.W.S.G.  (Evil Weenie Scientest Group) to create a ficticious phenomina called &quot;global warming&#039; with the sole intenet to do away with CARS!

I challenge you to do farm work when the fields are all deserts and to tow a pleasure boat when there is no fresh water.  Who is not living &quot;in the real world&quot;?  Although I doubt you could have less education, I think you could get in line with those &#039;weenie scientist&#039; to gain some extra &#039;smarts&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;What a bunch of HOOEY!<br />
&gt;It&#8217;s not about weather, it&#8217;s a well orchestrated campaign by weenie &gt;scientists who have more education than smarts to do away with &gt;automobiles. I challenge them to travel, do farm work, or tow a &gt;pleasure boat with an electric car.<br />
&gt;These guys just don&#8217;t live in the &#8220;real&#8221; world.</p>
<p>You are totally right.  In the early 50&#8217;s a diabolical plan was created the the E.W.S.G.  (Evil Weenie Scientest Group) to create a ficticious phenomina called &#8220;global warming&#8217; with the sole intenet to do away with CARS!</p>
<p>I challenge you to do farm work when the fields are all deserts and to tow a pleasure boat when there is no fresh water.  Who is not living &#8220;in the real world&#8221;?  Although I doubt you could have less education, I think you could get in line with those &#8216;weenie scientist&#8217; to gain some extra &#8217;smarts&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4270/comment-page-1#comment-11336</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2005 13:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-11336</guid>
		<description>Wow. There&#039;s almost enough intellect in here to brown toast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. There&#8217;s almost enough intellect in here to brown toast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4270/comment-page-1#comment-11335</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2005 12:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-11335</guid>
		<description>So you eject science as a factor in running the world and and its facts and you get what will happen absolutely nothing but dispair and no knowledge about anything really obviously you like the rest of the unconcerned have  NO BRAINS! when it comes to living in the quote--unquote real world...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you eject science as a factor in running the world and and its facts and you get what will happen absolutely nothing but dispair and no knowledge about anything really obviously you like the rest of the unconcerned have  NO BRAINS! when it comes to living in the quote&#8211;unquote real world&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4270/comment-page-1#comment-11334</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2005 12:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-11334</guid>
		<description>No your right, I&#039;d rather live on a dead planet than have to walk to work and light my house with candles.  And screw my kids having a future as well.. what do I care, I&#039;ll be dead by then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No your right, I&#8217;d rather live on a dead planet than have to walk to work and light my house with candles.  And screw my kids having a future as well.. what do I care, I&#8217;ll be dead by then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4270/comment-page-1#comment-11333</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2005 12:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-11333</guid>
		<description>If I&#039;m not mistaken it takes more energy to produce ethanol than the ethanol provides.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I&#8217;m not mistaken it takes more energy to produce ethanol than the ethanol provides.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4270/comment-page-1#comment-11332</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2005 12:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-11332</guid>
		<description>Over ten years ago in university, my professors were already expressing grave concerns about global warming. Even at the time, a majority of the scientific community (people who study climate for a living), were VERY concerned.  Now 10 year later, it is coming as a &quot;suprise&quot; to general population that global warming is an issue.  

Global warming has been one of the most downplayed significant event in the history of humanity (and potentially the world).  It has been supressed primarily by 1st world countries protecting their economies.  Big money controls the media content.  Most of the &#039;global warming is a sham&#039; arguments are crafted by &#039;oil company commissioned studies&#039; or govt studies that represent economic interest.  Ever wonder why, when 95% of scientist researching climate agree &#039;there is a problem&#039;, the 5% that disagree get 95% of the media coverage?

Anyone who has studied the earth knows that &quot;yes&quot; fluctuations have happened in the past.  However, the current findings are showing unprecidented fluctuations that directly correlate with industrialization of the planet.  In the history of the earth, there has NEVER been a fluctuation so large, so fast.  NEVER.

While no science is 100% perfect, even a monkey can see the parallel and draw a conclusion.   Even if there is a 1% chance that 95% of the scientific community is wrong, wouldn&#039;t it make sense to be pro-active now and stop emmissions until science can DISPROVE that global warming is an issue? 

Think about it.  Imagine being on ship that had a hole in the side and was taking on water.  Now imagine, 95% of highly trained &#039;boat inspectors&#039; agree that &quot;yes the ship will sink&quot;.   Would you want to listen to the other 5% and not patch the hole?  That is exactly what we are doing as a planet.  

It amuses me to no end that the general population is so &#039;skeptical&#039; of the scientific research.  Somehow ever person that has read a small news article against global warming, is suddenly &#039;a better expert&#039; than  95% of the scientific community.  Please note that the scientist that report global warming ACTUALLY study climate EVERY DAY and are HIGHLY TRAINED at it.  But somehow, every Jerry Springer fan that has read a single book or skimed a newspaper clipping knows better than the scientists and is justified in saying &quot;I don&#039;t believe it&quot;. Lets grab a brain (or borrow one from the monkey) while there are still things on the planet with brains.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over ten years ago in university, my professors were already expressing grave concerns about global warming. Even at the time, a majority of the scientific community (people who study climate for a living), were VERY concerned.  Now 10 year later, it is coming as a &#8220;suprise&#8221; to general population that global warming is an issue.  </p>
<p>Global warming has been one of the most downplayed significant event in the history of humanity (and potentially the world).  It has been supressed primarily by 1st world countries protecting their economies.  Big money controls the media content.  Most of the &#8216;global warming is a sham&#8217; arguments are crafted by &#8216;oil company commissioned studies&#8217; or govt studies that represent economic interest.  Ever wonder why, when 95% of scientist researching climate agree &#8216;there is a problem&#8217;, the 5% that disagree get 95% of the media coverage?</p>
<p>Anyone who has studied the earth knows that &#8220;yes&#8221; fluctuations have happened in the past.  However, the current findings are showing unprecidented fluctuations that directly correlate with industrialization of the planet.  In the history of the earth, there has NEVER been a fluctuation so large, so fast.  NEVER.</p>
<p>While no science is 100% perfect, even a monkey can see the parallel and draw a conclusion.   Even if there is a 1% chance that 95% of the scientific community is wrong, wouldn&#8217;t it make sense to be pro-active now and stop emmissions until science can DISPROVE that global warming is an issue? </p>
<p>Think about it.  Imagine being on ship that had a hole in the side and was taking on water.  Now imagine, 95% of highly trained &#8216;boat inspectors&#8217; agree that &#8220;yes the ship will sink&#8221;.   Would you want to listen to the other 5% and not patch the hole?  That is exactly what we are doing as a planet.  </p>
<p>It amuses me to no end that the general population is so &#8217;skeptical&#8217; of the scientific research.  Somehow ever person that has read a small news article against global warming, is suddenly &#8216;a better expert&#8217; than  95% of the scientific community.  Please note that the scientist that report global warming ACTUALLY study climate EVERY DAY and are HIGHLY TRAINED at it.  But somehow, every Jerry Springer fan that has read a single book or skimed a newspaper clipping knows better than the scientists and is justified in saying &#8220;I don&#8217;t believe it&#8221;. Lets grab a brain (or borrow one from the monkey) while there are still things on the planet with brains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4270/comment-page-1#comment-11331</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2005 12:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-11331</guid>
		<description>Because this, if they are right and we don&#039;t listen, there may not be a planet left to live on. This isn&#039;t a forecast of &quot;There will be light drizzle for the next couple days&quot;.. this is more like a tornado warning.. you&#039;d be a fool to ignore it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because this, if they are right and we don&#8217;t listen, there may not be a planet left to live on. This isn&#8217;t a forecast of &#8220;There will be light drizzle for the next couple days&#8221;.. this is more like a tornado warning.. you&#8217;d be a fool to ignore it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4270/comment-page-1#comment-11330</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2005 12:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-11330</guid>
		<description>Please forward an accurate scientific analyisys that DISPROVES the tripling of the C02 content of the atmosphere will increase atmospheric temperature by more than .25 C.  

Over ten years ago in university, my professors were already expressing grave concerns about global warming. Even at the time, a majority of the scientific community (people who study climate for a living), were VERY concerned.  Now 10 year later, it is coming as a &quot;suprise&quot; to general population that global warming is an issue.  

Global warming has been one of the most downplayed significant event in the history of humanity (and potentially the world).  It has been supressed primarily by 1st world countries protecting their economies.  Big money controls the media content.  Most of the &#039;global warming is a sham&#039; arguments are crafted by &#039;oil company commissioned studies&#039;.  Ever wonder why, when 95% of scientist researching climate agree &#039;there is a problem&#039;, the 5% that disagree get 95% of the media coverage?

Anyone who has studied the earth knows that &quot;yes&quot; fluctuations have happened in the past.  However, the current findings are showing unprecidented fluctuations that directly correlate with industrialization of the planet.  In the history of the earth, there has NEVER been a fluctuation so large, so fast.  NEVER.

While no science is 100% perfect, even a monkey can see the parallel and draw a reasonable conclusion.   Even if there is a 1% chance that 95% of the scientific community is wrong, wouldn&#039;t it make sense to be pro-active now and stop emmissions until science can DISPROVE that global warming is an issue? 

Think about it.  Imagine being on ship that had a hole in the side and was taking on water.  Now imagine, 95% of highly trained &#039;boat inspectors&#039; agree that &quot;yes the ship will sink&quot;.   Would you want to listen to the other 5% and not patch the hole?  That is exactly what we are doing as a planet.  

It amuses me to no end that the general population is so &#039;skeptical&#039; of the scientific research.  Somehow ever person that has read a small news article against global warming, is suddenly a better &#039;expert&#039; than the 95% of the scientific community.  And somehow, like the above fellow, they all have the knowledge required to evaluate scientific papers on climate model research and say &quot;I don&#039;t believe it&quot;. Lets grab a brain (or borrow one from the monkey) while there are still things on the planet with brains.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please forward an accurate scientific analyisys that DISPROVES the tripling of the C02 content of the atmosphere will increase atmospheric temperature by more than .25 C.  </p>
<p>Over ten years ago in university, my professors were already expressing grave concerns about global warming. Even at the time, a majority of the scientific community (people who study climate for a living), were VERY concerned.  Now 10 year later, it is coming as a &#8220;suprise&#8221; to general population that global warming is an issue.  </p>
<p>Global warming has been one of the most downplayed significant event in the history of humanity (and potentially the world).  It has been supressed primarily by 1st world countries protecting their economies.  Big money controls the media content.  Most of the &#8216;global warming is a sham&#8217; arguments are crafted by &#8216;oil company commissioned studies&#8217;.  Ever wonder why, when 95% of scientist researching climate agree &#8216;there is a problem&#8217;, the 5% that disagree get 95% of the media coverage?</p>
<p>Anyone who has studied the earth knows that &#8220;yes&#8221; fluctuations have happened in the past.  However, the current findings are showing unprecidented fluctuations that directly correlate with industrialization of the planet.  In the history of the earth, there has NEVER been a fluctuation so large, so fast.  NEVER.</p>
<p>While no science is 100% perfect, even a monkey can see the parallel and draw a reasonable conclusion.   Even if there is a 1% chance that 95% of the scientific community is wrong, wouldn&#8217;t it make sense to be pro-active now and stop emmissions until science can DISPROVE that global warming is an issue? </p>
<p>Think about it.  Imagine being on ship that had a hole in the side and was taking on water.  Now imagine, 95% of highly trained &#8216;boat inspectors&#8217; agree that &#8220;yes the ship will sink&#8221;.   Would you want to listen to the other 5% and not patch the hole?  That is exactly what we are doing as a planet.  </p>
<p>It amuses me to no end that the general population is so &#8217;skeptical&#8217; of the scientific research.  Somehow ever person that has read a small news article against global warming, is suddenly a better &#8216;expert&#8217; than the 95% of the scientific community.  And somehow, like the above fellow, they all have the knowledge required to evaluate scientific papers on climate model research and say &#8220;I don&#8217;t believe it&#8221;. Lets grab a brain (or borrow one from the monkey) while there are still things on the planet with brains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4270/comment-page-1#comment-11328</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2005 11:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-11328</guid>
		<description>re Canadian redneck:
Please forward an accurate scientific analysis that proves tripling the CO2 content of the atmosphere will increase atmospheric temperature by more than 0.25 C.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re Canadian redneck:<br />
Please forward an accurate scientific analysis that proves tripling the CO2 content of the atmosphere will increase atmospheric temperature by more than 0.25 C.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4270/comment-page-1#comment-11327</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2005 11:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-11327</guid>
		<description>I guess you walk to work and light your house with candles, huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess you walk to work and light your house with candles, huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


