<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canadian copyright revision</title>
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4278</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 06:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4278#comment-11424</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 18:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4278#comment-11424</guid>
		<description>What other links should I bookmark to keep up with the Canadian digital copyright issues?

Is CANFLI no longer the number 1 site? http://www.canfli.org/index.php

High on the list is Dr. Geist's site  http://www.michaelgeist.ca/

http://p2pnet.net/  of course.

Thanks for your article RMcO--I'm combing through your links now.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What other links should I bookmark to keep up with the Canadian digital copyright issues?</p>
<p>Is CANFLI no longer the number 1 site? <a href="http://www.canfli.org/index.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.canfli.org/index.php</a></p>
<p>High on the list is Dr. Geist&#8217;s site  <a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/" rel="nofollow">http://www.michaelgeist.ca/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://p2pnet.net/" rel="nofollow">http://p2pnet.net/</a>  of course.</p>
<p>Thanks for your article RMcO&#8211;I&#8217;m combing through your links now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4278#comment-11384</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 19:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4278#comment-11384</guid>
		<description>How you interpreted things is what has been implied to me so far.  Nobody has been willing to just tell me as this policy has to follow the regular channels.

We will know very soon.  Hopefully when this happens people will be at the digital-copyright.ca site and help us dissect the proposed legislation.

As to the manufacture/distribution of tools with "substantial non-infringing uses" this is something that is being challenged in a different setting.   If you are not already watching it you want to watch the Grokster case where US dinosaur-industry extremists are trying to overturn the Sony decision which clarified the legality of VCR's.

http://www.eff.org/IP/P2P/MGM_v_Grokster/

Russell McOrmond - http://www.digital-copyright.ca/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How you interpreted things is what has been implied to me so far.  Nobody has been willing to just tell me as this policy has to follow the regular channels.</p>
<p>We will know very soon.  Hopefully when this happens people will be at the digital-copyright.ca site and help us dissect the proposed legislation.</p>
<p>As to the manufacture/distribution of tools with &#8220;substantial non-infringing uses&#8221; this is something that is being challenged in a different setting.   If you are not already watching it you want to watch the Grokster case where US dinosaur-industry extremists are trying to overturn the Sony decision which clarified the legality of VCR&#8217;s.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.eff.org/IP/P2P/MGM_v_Grokster/" rel="nofollow">http://www.eff.org/IP/P2P/MGM_v_Grokster/</a></p>
<p>Russell McOrmond - <a href="http://www.digital-copyright.ca/" rel="nofollow">http://www.digital-copyright.ca/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4278#comment-11378</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 09:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4278#comment-11378</guid>
		<description>does this mean the canadian implementation will be more like what the currently ill fated "Digital millennium consumer rights act" specifies?

E.G. you are only punished for circumvention if you use it to infringe rather than for normal personal use by consumers?

what about actual manufacture/distribution of tools?  because if the following is so, it means nothing if people aren't allowed to market or buy the tools for such fair use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>does this mean the canadian implementation will be more like what the currently ill fated &#8220;Digital millennium consumer rights act&#8221; specifies?</p>
<p>E.G. you are only punished for circumvention if you use it to infringe rather than for normal personal use by consumers?</p>
<p>what about actual manufacture/distribution of tools?  because if the following is so, it means nothing if people aren&#8217;t allowed to market or buy the tools for such fair use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
