Welcome to p2pnet.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
REGISTER | LOGIN
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
Reviews
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Products
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
Kids and Kartels
Scroogle Search: 
Search
 
Web p2pnet   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
    Sponsored by
Frostwire
 
p2pnet
 


mp3rocket
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code

End of the Monoculture

p2pnet view Music | P2P:- “We are experiencing a revolution”, says Bob Lefsetz on The Lefsetz Letter.

Caused by the computer, aided by the Internet, “old media monoliths are crumbling and seedlings are popping up all over”, he says, going on >>>

The old guard is protesting, wannabes are struggling for a toehold in the decaying old game and newbies are reinventing the media business unchallenged and unknown.  And to outsiders, trying to make sense of it all, chaos reigns.  Desiring focus, those with loud voices demand a return to the earlier era.  But no one can turn back the hands of time.  Change has occurred which has caused a rupture in the entire fabric of our country.  And so far, no one has been able to make sense out of the result.

Take politics.  18% of Americans believe President Obama is a Muslim (http://bit.ly/bsC0VA).  Such delusion wouldn’t fly forty years ago, when there were only three TV networks and a Fairness Doctrine that eliminated dissemination of demented ideas.  But today, every insane theory and plot has a website, with adherents who refuse to see the other side.  They don’t have to.  Democrats read the HuffPo and Republicans read Drudge.  Do you think everyone’s going to pay attention to Top Forty music?

Of course not, because they’ve got choice.  Listeners pursue their dream down a zillion different nooks and crannies.  The lame Pandora gets traction because no one knows about Slacker.  Children embrace Disney stars because their parents haven’t yet removed the controls from their browsers.  We’ve got many different camps, oftentimes operating in ignorance.  People say there’s no good new music because the mainstream outlets are promoting crap.  When the truth is music is in a glorious time, you’ve just got to know where to look.  And when you do look, you’ve got to separate the wheat from the chaff.  There are many more acts than before.  And most of them are terrible.  It’s too daunting to delve in.

And then you’ve got the old guard saying that we’ve got to return to their way.  Which is an impossibility, because of choice.

Then there are the newspapers.  Which, like record labels, say they’re entitled to survive.  But why should I read the national news in the “Los Angeles Times” when the “New York Times” does it so much better and it’s just a click away online?  Used to be you couldn’t read the “New York Times” in L.A.  But those days are gone.

As are the days when the “New York Times” was the ultimate authority.  There’s a plethora of bloggers to not only critique what the “New York Times” has to say, but to trumpet stories the Gray Lady ignores.

And despite its vaunted place atop the print media pile, the “New York Times” doesn’t like its authority challenged.  But it’s got no choice.

Things used to be different.  MTV anointed stars and the public bought the records and went to the shows.  And radio was complicit, stations played the MTV hits.  And there was a limited number of releases, because distribution was a barrier to the entry of independents.

Now anybody can get their track on iTunes and MTV has stricken “Music Television” from its moniker and radio is lost, playing the hits of yesteryear or the vapid concoctions of today in between twenty odd minutes of commercials.  People have got choice.  And they’re exercising it.

It’s kind of like the transition from AM to FM in the sixties.  AM supporters decried FM.  The signal was weak.  The bands were unknown.  But the free-format stations ultimately killed AM.  Music left the AM band completely.  And FM acts without single hits were slaying in stadiums while AM acts were lucky to appear on bland television shows and play the lounge in Vegas.

Only now, imagine an FM band with thousands of stations!  You’ve got freedom of choice, but you’re not sure how to exercise it.

This chaotic period is coming to a close.  Suddenly, there are acts plying the boards with no terrestrial radio airplay who are well known by their audience and can survive quite handsomely in their own niche.  But, since there’s no longer a pyramid, no longer the anointment of MTV airplay, there’s not a defined breakthrough into the stratosphere.  The build just continues, slowly, but surely.  Yet now the indie acts are not quite so indie, we’ve heard of twenty or thirty of them.  The landscape is firming up.  For everybody but the old guard.

The old guard is losing power.  It’s more expensive than ever to create a hit that fewer people listen to or care about.  Top  Forty radio is about beats created by producers, radio anthems concocted by committee.  It’s purely commerce.  Whereas the soul of music is elsewhere.

So if you wanna be a rock and roll star…

1. Know that people are looking for music.  They’re inured to listening online and on the go.  More people are listening to more music than ever before.

2. Know that the money is not in music.  The money is in tech, on Wall Street.  It’s not about theft of recordings, it’s a change in society.  Music doesn’t drive it.  There’s more money in sports.  You’ve got to play because you love it.

3. It takes longer than ever to truly make it.  The old wave insta-stardom the major labels specialize in…  Those acts never survived the hype in the eighties and nineties, why should they now?  Overexposed, they’re thrown on the scrapheap in just a few years.

4. Practice makes perfect.  Just because you can make music, put it up on iTunes and YouTube and…doesn’t mean anybody should listen to it, that anybody should care.  Marketing means less than ever before.  Hell, if you truly want to make it as a musician, you’re better off cutting the Internet cord and practicing and gigging for five years before you put your music online, where people will find it.  But traction will be slow.  And you might not get rich.  Are you willing to sign up for this route?

5. Don’t listen to anybody with a toehold in today’s music firmament unless they’re in the live business.  Everybody else is caught up in the tsunami of change and just wants you to keep the old paradigm going.  They’re clueless.  They’re royalty still living in the castle trying to fend off a public that’s been maligned and is joyous in tearing down old institutions by ignoring them.  Yes, that’s how the impact of Top Forty wonders has declined.  The public is ignoring them.

6. If you’re a fan, don’t believe anything you read in the mainstream media.  Trust your friends.  If you find something good, continue to tell your friends.  Protest high prices.  Support your favorite acts.

“What the old guard doesn’t understand is this is instinct, to only buy what you can afford and only promote what you like”, says Lefsetz, adding:

“They’ve been living beyond their means selling crap so long the whites of their eyes are brown and they’ll say anything to maintain their lifestyles.

“That’s not about music, but money.  But now you only get money if you make it about the music.”

Follow p2pnet on Twitter..

… and identi.ca

The Lefsetz Letter – The End Of Monoculture, September 3, 2010

Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It`s really easy!

Subscribe to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php


Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details.

HOME

3 Responses to “End of the Monoculture”

  1. Reader's Write Says:

    “Such delusion wouldn’t fly forty years ago, when there were only three TV networks and a Fairness Doctrine that eliminated dissemination of demented ideas.”

    What a ridiculous statement.

    People are more awake to reality now than they have ever been. Over the past forty years, three TV networks didn’t stop the dissemination of the idea that a lone nut shot Kennedy, the Gulf of Tonkin incident was real, Iraqi soldiers were tossing Kuwaiti babies out of incubators, 9/11 was done solely by cave-dwellers, Saddam had WMDs, swine flu will kill everyone, Obama will stop the wars and stop the torture in Gitmo, and on and on and on. Lefsetz cherry-picked a very frivolous example to back up his false argument.

    TV has been the sole purveyor of “demented ideas” ever since the corporate broadcasters were born. Operation Mockingbird (look it up) has been in effect for decades, and now they openly admit they spend BILLIONS on “domestic information operations” just from the Defence Department alone.

    Now TV and it’s corporate whore talking heads have lost the monopoly on information dissemination, and those who are inclined to research and learn the truth are able to expose the mainstream media and gov’t lies for all to see.

    Pull your head out of your ass, Lefsetz.

  2. Reader's Write Says:

    “People say there’s no good new music because the mainstream outlets are promoting crap. When the truth is music is in a glorious time, you’ve just got to know where to look.”

    I agree with that.

    Actually the good music is coming because the corporation of parasites and their marketing BS are basically gone.

    People realizing that the 20th century were crap went back to listen to the music of the 19th then build something new by using it as a standard of quality. So far I found two groups in this trend but I am sure there is more to discover.

    *One is Adagio (Sanctus Ignis 2001, Underworld 2003 ,Dominate 2005, Dark Angel 2009) with Stephane forte composer making music the way Beethoven was doing it. The difference is that he use an electric guitar instead of a piano and use a computer to record the score instead of a piece of paper. Also he work very hard on it taking probably months to make the music for one album, not few days like some RIAA drone use to. Of course Stephane forte know it’s classics Beethoven, Bruckner Wagner (more relevantly Vivaldi and Paganini) and the like but this is not classic unless you call classic written and carefully crafted music “classic” vs less sophisticated improvised and often dis-formed music. And the result you might say? At first it sound like rock music but like classical after more careful listening there come the revelation. Overall it has the sophistication of classical. Complex scores and harmony virtuosity that require years of practice, good and great tunes, myriad of brilliant findings, inventions, and novelties. The artistic revolution of the 21st Century is definitively there.

    Criticisms? Yes of course, always.

    1) The beat although much more varied than typical rock music is kind of monotonous compare to what we are use to with the 19th Century classical.

    2) The lyric kind of suck but the lyric in classical often suck too as the focus is on the music not the lyric.

    4) Sometime the singer growl and scream as instructed and this is not very happy.

    3) There is virtually no work done on tonality but while using analogical electric guitars that would be pointless since technically they don’t sound great. (At some point someone will have to modify this dam electric guitar and make it sound better) I feel like they should be replaced by violin and cello and the keyboard replaced by a church pipe organ.

    *The second is Apocalyptica. Holy shit! I just discover this rock group few days ago so I don’t have much info yet. They are based on 5 virtuoso cellists. Sometime they play by themselves and sometime they play accompanied by a battery and an electric guitar. I don’t know who is the composer bu the music is definitively at the level of 19th century classical.

    The music is back from jail folks in a big time!

  3. Dreddsnik Says:

    ” “Such delusion wouldn’t fly forty years ago, when there were only three TV networks and a Fairness Doctrine that eliminated dissemination of demented ideas.”

    What a ridiculous statement. ”

    I have to go along with that.
    40 years ago a whole lot more than 18% would believe the Obama/Muslim crap.
    The networks and mainstream media have been pushing that idea ( albeit slyly ) since
    the elections. The only reason that it HASN’T gotten traction beyond the nutballs is the internet.
    The ‘Fairness’ Doctrine didn’t eliminate anything. It only gave the illusion of truth and legitimacy
    to anything the TV says … making it easier to trust those that lie.

    Other than that, The article seems to be pretty on point.

Leave a Reply

ONLY items referencing the post at hand, please. No links to personal sites, no personal attacks, trolling, freebie advertising, or off-topic posts. Thanks. And Cheers!

    Sponsored by
tek savvy