Counterfeiting in all forms is on a world wide rampage due to high end physical technologies now available to the masses at relatively little cost. Even American currency is under siege. The bandits have gotten so far ahead ($$$) that said gains are used to employ defense. Everything from generous grants, gifts, and incentives to haters and even nuclear bombs have been financed by the counterfeiters’ gains.

Many of these companies woes have been manufactured and designed by beneficiaries of such financing. P2Pnet.net is a direct profiteer of the counterfeiting game. It is no wonder that a one sided POS story like this appears here. There are other sides.

IE… A Judge had this to say about-

Felten (with help from the Electronic Frontier Foundation) sued the groups, requesting a declaratory judgement ruling that their publication of the paper would be legal. The case was dismissed for a lack of standing with the judge noting that:

“The irony is that the defendants having said we’re not going to sue you, the plaintiffs decided apparently to catalyze this action by bringing a suit themselves…
The plaintiffs liken themselves to modern Galileos persecuted by authorities. I fear that a more apt analogy would be to modern day Don Quixotes feeling threatened by windmills which they perceive as giants. There is no real controversy here.”[1]

Unfortunately, there is not enough time in my personal life to tear down the collective of the miscreant efforts to torpedo this enterprise and the lopsided reporting of them in this POS story.

At least the judge gets it.

Too bad the cost of justice is so high while the cost of counterfeiting is so low.

But it is certainly great for P2PNET.NET

Mr. Fence

Counterfeiting in all forms is on a world wide rampage due to high end physical technologies now available to the masses at relatively little cost. Even American currency is under siege. The bandits have gotten so far ahead ($$$) that said gains are used to employ defense. Everything from generous grants, gifts, and incentives to haters and even nuclear bombs have been financed by the counterfeiters’ gains.

Many of these companies woes have been manufactured and designed by beneficiaries of such financing. P2Pnet.net is a direct profiteer of the counterfeiting game. It is no wonder that a one sided POS story like this appears here. There are other sides.

IE… A Judge had this to say about-

Felten (with help from the Electronic Frontier Foundation) sued the groups, requesting a declaratory judgement ruling that their publication of the paper would be legal. The case was dismissed for a lack of standing with the judge noting that:

“The irony is that the defendants having said we’re not going to sue you, the plaintiffs decided apparently to catalyze this action by bringing a suit themselves…
The plaintiffs liken themselves to modern Galileos persecuted by authorities. I fear that a more apt analogy would be to modern day Don Quixotes feeling threatened by windmills which they perceive as giants. There is no real controversy here.”[1]

Unfortunately, there is not enough time in my personal life to tear down the collective of the miscreant efforts to torpedo this enterprise and the lopsided reporting of them in this POS story.

At least the judge gets it.

Too bad the cost of justice is so high while the cost of counterfeiting is so low.

But it is certainly great for P2PNET.NET

Mr. Fence

I also noticed that none of those who claim it to be lopsided have made any attempt to say what was wrong.

Whomever is shorting SCMI shares, and people associated with MVSN are scared right now. BMG is being very aggressive about adopting MediaMax because it does reduce piracy and is seen as a value added enhancement to compact disc buyers.

Howard Stern is kicking off the process of making MediaMax a popular brand. Stay tuned for the other side of the story.

Shorts, better COVER your tails soon. The cat will be out of the sack soon.