<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Studios report record revenues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4735/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4735</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:27:55 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4735/comment-page-1#comment-13164</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2005 00:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-13164</guid>
		<description>Nuf said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nuf said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4735/comment-page-1#comment-13161</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2005 23:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-13161</guid>
		<description>I agree. If someone shares a movie and likes it, it&#039;s only good PR, word of mouth that the movie was good. I know a lot of people that share to &quot;preview&quot; the movie before possibly buying the DVD for their collection. It eliminates paying for a crappy movie that is falsly represented in advertisements as &quot;two thumbs up&quot;. There is no &quot;warranty&quot; issued for movies that are falsly repesented as &quot;good&quot;. Personally, I have around 190 DVD&#039;s in my collection, most of them purchased used a month or so  after they are released so the price has come way down.
You would not purchase a car before you drove it, even thought there are &quot;lemon Laws&quot; in most states. Well there is no protection of consumers money by the Entertainment Cartel.

The story hits the hammer on the head though about &quot;piracy&quot;.  Reproducing for profit is just plain wrong. I was in Chinatown(NYC) a few years ago, and one store was selling movies for $5 each with photocopies of the jackets. they were not even attempting to hide this as there was aoround 60 VCR&#039;s recording and one playing RIGHT ON THEIR SIDE WALL!!! Nothing was done to stop this. That is a HUGE difference from sharing to preview a movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. If someone shares a movie and likes it, it&#8217;s only good PR, word of mouth that the movie was good. I know a lot of people that share to &#8220;preview&#8221; the movie before possibly buying the DVD for their collection. It eliminates paying for a crappy movie that is falsly represented in advertisements as &#8220;two thumbs up&#8221;. There is no &#8220;warranty&#8221; issued for movies that are falsly repesented as &#8220;good&#8221;. Personally, I have around 190 DVD&#8217;s in my collection, most of them purchased used a month or so  after they are released so the price has come way down.<br />
You would not purchase a car before you drove it, even thought there are &#8220;lemon Laws&#8221; in most states. Well there is no protection of consumers money by the Entertainment Cartel.</p>
<p>The story hits the hammer on the head though about &#8220;piracy&#8221;.  Reproducing for profit is just plain wrong. I was in Chinatown(NYC) a few years ago, and one store was selling movies for $5 each with photocopies of the jackets. they were not even attempting to hide this as there was aoround 60 VCR&#8217;s recording and one playing RIGHT ON THEIR SIDE WALL!!! Nothing was done to stop this. That is a HUGE difference from sharing to preview a movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
