Anonymous first 2011 action: 1984
p2pnet view P2P:- “Dear Anon, type your E-mail to get the updates!” – says the dialogue box to the operation1984 form on the right.
And that’s it.
“After a content renovation on the official IRC channels, it might seem to one that there lately, have been a more official approach to how Anon (By Anon subject is, to avoid confusion, targeted at OperationPayback and such) should continue their existence”, says a post on Anon News, adding:
“More organized operations have seen the light such as Operation Leakspin, Operation DarkNet and such ones, and it seems like Anon is taking the same approach.
“Latest example of this is the new ‘secret’ operation there has been floating around the Internet.”
The kick-off date is January 7.
Stay tuned.
January, 2011
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win ~ Mahatma Gandhi
World War III will be a global information war with no division between civilian & military participation ~ Marshall McLuhan
Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. Subscribe to p2pnet.net | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/feed
Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details.
January 1st, 2011 at 1:00 pm
Ad post above, Jon.
January 1st, 2011 at 2:33 pm
Be very cautious of those who are trying to ‘lead’ anonymous. Very very cautious.
You do not want to be used as a dupe or clueless patsy. Think very carefully about all the political ramifications of any actions you are participating in, and who’s agenda might ultimately benefit.
I’m not saying you shouldn’t fire your lazers, just don’t do it blindly, and think a few steps ahead first. The enemies of freedom WILL ATTEMPT TO INFILTRATE and CO-OPT the phenomenon known as ‘anonymous’ and use it as a tool. Be VERY SUSPICIOUS of anyone or any group trying to lead you by the nose.
January 1st, 2011 at 4:33 pm
Any anon who wants to stay anon doesn’t give out their addy or info that can be traced.
January 1st, 2011 at 8:49 pm
@ above, is that fact? Wow! Thanks for sharing (rolls eyes)
January 1st, 2011 at 11:22 pm
@ Judge
Anonymous appears to refer more to being a unity of people without a clear face, than staying 100% anonymous, nowadays. Quite a few anons know each other, and staying anonymous for the sake of staying anonymous is not a good thing in my opinion.
January 2nd, 2011 at 8:13 am
@Sven
Of coarse. I didn’t say not to meet or know each other. I said not to divulge your private info for those who may abuse it or an anon.
January 2nd, 2011 at 2:56 pm
Judge is a roflcer of the lawl and doesn’t even know it. Internet lawler with 10 PhDs, you best give him mad respeck.
January 3rd, 2011 at 2:23 pm
The funny think is that the FBI is looking for the leader of anonymous!
Whahahahahahahahahaha!
What a pack of dorks!
January 3rd, 2011 at 2:28 pm
“The enemies of freedom WILL ATTEMPT TO INFILTRATE and CO-OPT the phenomenon known as ‘anonymous’ and use it as a tool. Be VERY SUSPICIOUS of anyone or any group trying to lead you by the nose.”
It is probably what is happening with El Quada. Some even believe that Ben Laden is a CIA agent.
Than will explain why they did not catch him yet after more than 9 years.
They don’t want to catch him!
January 4th, 2011 at 2:46 pm
“Some even believe that Ben Laden is a CIA agent.”
Bin Laden WAS a product of the CIA, and a friend of GW Bush.
Another disturbing “bit of trivia”… Members of bin Laden’s family were in the US on 9/11, escorted by the CIA to their plane, and given permission to exit the country, while all other flights in the US were grounded.
These 3 facts have been published to death, with no arguments from any government agency or the Media.
________________________________
“Than will explain why they did not catch him yet after more than 9 years.”
You don’t need to “catch” someone who is dead.
Many sources suggest bin Laden died of kidney failure in December of 2001. Whether true or not, the US government will deny it, as they need to keep this “boogeyman” alive in the minds of the People. Think of the implications of this one!