<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will Google censor China op?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4914/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4914</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:59:30 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4914/comment-page-1#comment-14040</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2005 03:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14040</guid>
		<description>If you think ANY commercial search engine provider will walk away from a market the size of China rather than be subjet to a Chinese government mandated censorship program you are dreaming. They go where the money is, censorship or not, just like any other large multi-national corporation. The Chinese government will not allow them to operate without censorship. Period. Who&#039;s best interests do you think Google puts at the top of the list? The Chinese people? Your&#039;s? Perhaps GOOGLE&#039;s????  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you think ANY commercial search engine provider will walk away from a market the size of China rather than be subjet to a Chinese government mandated censorship program you are dreaming. They go where the money is, censorship or not, just like any other large multi-national corporation. The Chinese government will not allow them to operate without censorship. Period. Who&#8217;s best interests do you think Google puts at the top of the list? The Chinese people? Your&#8217;s? Perhaps GOOGLE&#8217;s????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4914/comment-page-1#comment-14021</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 23:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14021</guid>
		<description>It would be nice to see a company do the right thing.  I believe that Goggle will do what is right, and if not, I will be looking for other search engine alternatives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be nice to see a company do the right thing.  I believe that Goggle will do what is right, and if not, I will be looking for other search engine alternatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
