<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Movies File Share Top Ten</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4978/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4978</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:11:30 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4978/comment-page-1#comment-14390</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2005 02:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14390</guid>
		<description>Somebody should take the time time to actually check these stats sometime.
Not only is Star Wars missing from the 26th but the download numbers have
increased a factor of two in one week. Time for a reality check I think.
It seems the &quot;unchanged&quot; makes absolutely no sense either.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somebody should take the time time to actually check these stats sometime.<br />
Not only is Star Wars missing from the 26th but the download numbers have<br />
increased a factor of two in one week. Time for a reality check I think.<br />
It seems the &#8220;unchanged&#8221; makes absolutely no sense either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4978/comment-page-1#comment-14324</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2005 23:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14324</guid>
		<description> it just barely made the top 10 in the USA chart (BTW: it says May18, not 26). Star Wars: ROTS should have been the most downloaded movie of the year. How can it&#039;s low ranking be explained? Big Champage must not even be tracking BitTorrent - where the large bulk of the downloads this past week have been Star Wars. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it just barely made the top 10 in the USA chart (BTW: it says May18, not 26). Star Wars: ROTS should have been the most downloaded movie of the year. How can it&#8217;s low ranking be explained? Big Champage must not even be tracking BitTorrent &#8211; where the large bulk of the downloads this past week have been Star Wars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4978/comment-page-1#comment-14323</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2005 23:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14323</guid>
		<description>yeh but look how quickly it got in. it usually takes a while</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeh but look how quickly it got in. it usually takes a while</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4978/comment-page-1#comment-14322</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2005 23:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14322</guid>
		<description>Revenge of the Sith came in only 9th?  Gee, the way Glickman was having a hissy fit, you would have thought it was downloaded 74,000,000 times.  Well, 290,542 have gone and &#039;ruined&#039; the whole thing for themselves.  The nerve!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Revenge of the Sith came in only 9th?  Gee, the way Glickman was having a hissy fit, you would have thought it was downloaded 74,000,000 times.  Well, 290,542 have gone and &#8216;ruined&#8217; the whole thing for themselves.  The nerve!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
