<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: From Swords to Writs to Bits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4981/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4981</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:56:24 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4981/comment-page-1#comment-14478</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2005 01:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14478</guid>
		<description>nope, he basically detailed the failure of encryption in most markets, and the general insult it is to consumers, then went on to other means of ensuring compensation, such as the fact that as software production online becomes more mature updates will become more continuous, updates which will not work on so called &quot;pirated&quot; copies.

I think from what i&#039;ve seen so far it&#039;s a brilliant analysis, even if the speculation is admitted by the author himself to be bounded by improperly physical rationales.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nope, he basically detailed the failure of encryption in most markets, and the general insult it is to consumers, then went on to other means of ensuring compensation, such as the fact that as software production online becomes more mature updates will become more continuous, updates which will not work on so called &#8220;pirated&#8221; copies.</p>
<p>I think from what i&#8217;ve seen so far it&#8217;s a brilliant analysis, even if the speculation is admitted by the author himself to be bounded by improperly physical rationales.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/4981/comment-page-1#comment-14417</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2005 22:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14417</guid>
		<description>So, essentially, he&#039;s advocating sweeping DRM schemes?

Perhaps I&#039;m wrong in reading that from this (after all, it did go on a bit...well, quite a bit).  A lot was pseudo-intellectual fluff, but it seems that it ultimately fell into the &quot;encryption&quot; trap like everyone else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, essentially, he&#8217;s advocating sweeping DRM schemes?</p>
<p>Perhaps I&#8217;m wrong in reading that from this (after all, it did go on a bit&#8230;well, quite a bit).  A lot was pseudo-intellectual fluff, but it seems that it ultimately fell into the &#8220;encryption&#8221; trap like everyone else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
