<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel denies DRM charges</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/5057/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/5057</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/5057/comment-page-1#comment-14659</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2005 16:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14659</guid>
		<description>The key word in their &quot;no DRM&quot; claim is here:
&quot;...do not have _unannounced_, embedded DRM technology,&quot; it states.

So what is announced?
Trusted Computing Initiative is newspeak for DRM... :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The key word in their &#8220;no DRM&#8221; claim is here:<br />
&#8220;&#8230;do not have _unannounced_, embedded DRM technology,&#8221; it states.</p>
<p>So what is announced?<br />
Trusted Computing Initiative is newspeak for DRM&#8230; <img src='http://www.p2pnet.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/5057/comment-page-1#comment-14643</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2005 03:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14643</guid>
		<description>Here is a quote from this web page:
http://www.law.berkeley.edu/institutes/bclt/drm/trans/drm-2-28-p2.htm



         I attended some of the formative meetings, and at one                 
         meeting, one of the principles, the founding principles, of this 
         Trusted Computing Association, TCPA, after we were 
         discussing secure boot ....he again said, &quot;It&#039;s important to 
         prevent the public from thinking that we are building a DRM 
         system.&quot; After two or three such remarks, I started to wonder 
         what is going on here; what are these people really up to. 
         During a break, I took aside one of the other founding members 
         of the Trusted Computing Platform Alliance, in fact, a fellow 
         who works for a well known, large vendor of operating 
         systems and office productivity software, and asked him, &quot;So 
         fill me in; what&#039;s going on here? Why are we here today?&quot; And 
         he told me, &quot;Listen, it&#039;s very simple; our operating system 
         platform, on a general peer purpose PC, currently does not 
         have server content available, such as for example high quality 
         streaming video, that our customers demand. The content 
         owners, or I should say the accumulators and distributors, 
         have told us that they will not make this content available until 
         such time that we have these features available on our 
         platform. We don&#039;t have much of a choice, we have to solve 
         this problem one way or another.&quot; 

Do feel free to give this better exposure as a story.  Intel are a bunch of lying cowards.  The company has well documented research efforts aimed at in-chip DRM, and the &quot;ide redirection&quot; sounds very similar to the hollings bill designed to allow rightsholders to remotely destroy people&#039;s data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a quote from this web page:<br />
<a href="http://www.law.berkeley.edu/institutes/bclt/drm/trans/drm-2-28-p2.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.law.berkeley.edu/institutes/bclt/drm/trans/drm-2-28-p2.htm</a></p>
<p>         I attended some of the formative meetings, and at one<br />
         meeting, one of the principles, the founding principles, of this<br />
         Trusted Computing Association, TCPA, after we were<br />
         discussing secure boot &#8230;.he again said, &#8220;It&#8217;s important to<br />
         prevent the public from thinking that we are building a DRM<br />
         system.&#8221; After two or three such remarks, I started to wonder<br />
         what is going on here; what are these people really up to.<br />
         During a break, I took aside one of the other founding members<br />
         of the Trusted Computing Platform Alliance, in fact, a fellow<br />
         who works for a well known, large vendor of operating<br />
         systems and office productivity software, and asked him, &#8220;So<br />
         fill me in; what&#8217;s going on here? Why are we here today?&#8221; And<br />
         he told me, &#8220;Listen, it&#8217;s very simple; our operating system<br />
         platform, on a general peer purpose PC, currently does not<br />
         have server content available, such as for example high quality<br />
         streaming video, that our customers demand. The content<br />
         owners, or I should say the accumulators and distributors,<br />
         have told us that they will not make this content available until<br />
         such time that we have these features available on our<br />
         platform. We don&#8217;t have much of a choice, we have to solve<br />
         this problem one way or another.&#8221; </p>
<p>Do feel free to give this better exposure as a story.  Intel are a bunch of lying cowards.  The company has well documented research efforts aimed at in-chip DRM, and the &#8220;ide redirection&#8221; sounds very similar to the hollings bill designed to allow rightsholders to remotely destroy people&#8217;s data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/5057/comment-page-1#comment-14627</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2005 23:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14627</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s bad enough we have to deal with DRM infested CD&#039;s &amp; DVD&#039;s. Now we have to watch out for DRM infested PC&#039;s ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s bad enough we have to deal with DRM infested CD&#8217;s &#038; DVD&#8217;s. Now we have to watch out for DRM infested PC&#8217;s ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/5057/comment-page-1#comment-14623</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2005 23:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14623</guid>
		<description>Oh yea... like I really believe that... I&#039;m still never buying another processor from them again...
Just leave DRM completely out of your hardware people!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yea&#8230; like I really believe that&#8230; I&#8217;m still never buying another processor from them again&#8230;<br />
Just leave DRM completely out of your hardware people!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


