Comments on: W2K and IE7?

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Fri, 10 Feb 2006 02:48:08 +0000

W2K rocks, IE sucks. what’s more to say?…

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sat, 04 Jun 2005 08:41:54 +0000

http://litepc.com/

Yes, you CAN remove IE. Completely.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Fri, 03 Jun 2005 12:52:38 +0000

damn you microsoft… they drop support for their operating systems… WAY too early… T_T

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Fri, 03 Jun 2005 06:29:28 +0000

I like W2K. I still use W2K. Just because MS says so doesn’t make it obsolete. W2K isn’t just going to stop working. W2K is great for slower hardware. Their beloved XP is built on W2K.

And as for IE7, really, I couldn’t care less. After installing Mozilla years ago, I haven’t looked back. I buried IE as much as I could (can’t uninstall, you see) and don’t care if I ever see that little blue “e” again.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Fri, 03 Jun 2005 00:55:58 +0000

That is one of the main reasons why I chose Linux of Win2k. Why should I be forced to buy another product when the one I currently have works just fine? If the new version of Windows offered compelling new features that benefits me, then they would not have to force people to buy a new operating system just to repair their security lapses.

I know, with Linux (SuSE) security upgrades are available with just a simple download.