Comments on: TPMs and copyright http://www.p2pnet.net/story/5227 p2pnet.net - reader powered Thu, 08 Jan 2009 00:02:36 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1 By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/5227#comment-15369 Reader's Write Mon, 20 Jun 2005 17:35:38 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/5227#comment-15369 Fee distribution in Voluntary Collective Licensing should not be based on what is shared, but rather on what is played... If I have a new crappy file shared but noone likes it, why should the author of that get a fee? But if people listen to particular song author should get paid... and a sample-listening (like 30sec) should not get counted as full play... Fee distribution in Voluntary Collective Licensing should not be based on what is shared, but rather on what is played…

If I have a new crappy file shared but noone likes it, why should the author of that get a fee? But if people listen to particular song author should get paid… and a sample-listening (like 30sec) should not get counted as full play…

]]>