Welcome to P2PNET.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
Register | Login
RIAA News
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
TV
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Product News
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
Kids and Kartels
Search: 
Search
 
Web P2PNET   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
Teksavvy
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code
p2pnet - rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | p2pnet celebrities: http://p2pnet.net/celeb.rss | Mobile? http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php

Fee TV v free TV

p2pnet.net News:- “The strategy of the industry is not to fight the pirates so much as beat them at their own game - by making television programming available, for a fee, on legitimate Internet-based video libraries.”

That’s a quote from the June 27 Newsweek online, the subject being the prevalence of TV shows on the p2p networks.

It doesn’t explain how selling files you can already get for free will beat the ‘pirates’, the entertainment industry’s catch-all phrase for people who make video and audio files available online without having first been ripped off by the industry by one means or another.

The article mentions Suranga Chandratillake’s Blinkx, a “search engine for audio and video files” which is, “taking the shows of his clients - including Fox News, MTV and other networks - and making them accessible by a simple word search.”

err, wow?

“The most popular TV shows have been downloaded tens of thousands of times from sites like eDonkey and Bit-Torrent - each episode of the Fox show ‘24,’ for instance, was downloaded about 95,000 times after it first aired, according to Envisional, an England-based peer-to-peer traffic monitor,” says the story, going on:

“There’s this general assumption that people will always steal content if they can, but I don’t think that’s true,” says Chandratillake. “The success of the new Napster and iTunes demonstrates that people are very interested in downloading broadband content online and paying for it - if it’s priced right and available easily.”

The only people making that “general assumption” are the entertainment cartels as they try to sue their former customers into buying poor quality, over-priced CDs and mp3s, at the same time claiming anyone who doesn’t do so is an actual or potential criminal.

People are indeed interested in downloading broadband content online and paying for it - if it’s priced right and available easily.

But that automatically lets the corporate music industry out. It’s already demanding around 70 cents wholesale for mp3s which are lossy, compressed copies of existing CD/DVD tracks. And it wants to hike that.

As to availability, the labels are releasing only a tiny poriton of the music that’s available on their many catalogs, which date back decades.

The networks would clearly (dearly?) love to shut down the video peer-to-peer networks, says Newsweek. “But they can’t” because, “New file-sharing applications like BitTorrent and eDonkey are difficult to regulate. Video pirates have eschewed the use of centralized servers in their file-swapping networks, relying instead on decentralized networks that are virtually impossible to bust.”

And ‘legal’ measures haven’t worked so far, says the post:

“In May a U.S. federal appeals court struck down antipiracy regulations put in place by the Federal Communications Commission and supported by networks. TV executives from Europe, Asia and elsewhere are closely watching other file-sharing litigation as well; these executives believe that American courts will set the tone for how emerging markets like China and India choose to treat intellectual property.

“Thus far, the Motion Picture Association of America has spearheaded the anti-pirating charge, filing lawsuits in dozens of countries, including China, France and the Netherlands,” says Newsweek, adding:

“At the moment, the video pirates still have the advantage. But if Google and Yahoo and the other search companies succeed in doing for video what iTunes has done for music, Chandratillake should be able to watch ‘The Apprentice’ - or just about any other show - any time he wants. For a fee.”

In the meanwhile back in the real world …….

Something you think we should know? tips[at]p2pnet.net

See:-
Newsweek - All TV Shows, All the Time, June 27, 2005

HOME

7 Responses to “Fee TV v free TV”

  1. Reader's Write Says:

    “…from sites like eDonkey and Bit-Torrent…”
    *****************************************

    they still don’t understand. edonkey and bittorrent are not sites. they are programs.

    effin’ idiots don’t understand the technology they want to steal from us.

  2. Reader's Write Says:

  3. Reader's Write Says:

    I think the point with blinkx is that it uses speech recognition to let you search into clips - so not just the titles, etc… you can try at www.blinkx.tv doesn’t search torrents as far as I can tell though.

  4. Reader's Write Says:

    does blinkx v3.0 have spyware and adware?

  5. Reader's Write Says:

    Almost totaly agree with this quote:
    “People will pay IF it’s priced right AND available easily”

    but must expand it a little
    AND is in as high quality as available in p2p
    AND has not DRM attached

    2 down to to go :)

    Yes and being without DRM doesn’t mean I will copy it for my neghbour… if its cheap and he wants it he will have to buy it for himself.
    No DRM part is there for me - I don’t want to go thru some patching-cracking-reencoding process to watch (something I paid for) on my laptop… hell no!

  6. Reader's Write Says:

    I have blinkx 3 and there are no ads in it. but … you can try video search on its own at blinkx.tv without downloading software anyway….

  7. Reader's Write Says:

    I have blinkx 3 and there are no ads in it. but … you can try video search on its own at blinkx.tv without downloading software anyway….

Leave a Reply

    Advertisments
MP3rocket