<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FTC p2p study: risks, benefits</title>
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/5321</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net offers not-your-lamescream news on movies music digital media P2P peer-to-peer TV television file sharing freedom of speech open source product news Wifi mobiles company</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/5321#comment-15620</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 07:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/5321#comment-15620</guid>
		<description>Who is them? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who is them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/5321#comment-15616</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 06:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/5321#comment-15616</guid>
		<description>I only have one comment about this report. 

"Fuck em"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I only have one comment about this report. </p>
<p>&#8220;Fuck em&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/5321#comment-15610</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 04:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/5321#comment-15610</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<br />
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/5321#comment-15605</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 03:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/5321#comment-15605</guid>
		<description>The report is 60 pages long with 300 or  so footnotes, but the selective posting here shows only cherry-picking topic setences.   Maybe reading the substance of the report and putting the substance out would be a better way to have an informed discussion</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The report is 60 pages long with 300 or  so footnotes, but the selective posting here shows only cherry-picking topic setences.   Maybe reading the substance of the report and putting the substance out would be a better way to have an informed discussion</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
