<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cdn copyright bill vs Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/5562/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/5562</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/5562/comment-page-1#comment-133105</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 07:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-133105</guid>
		<description>Of course the intent of this bill is (hopefully) to protect search engines and archiving tools such as WebCite [http://www.webcitation.org] (a Canadian-made counterpart of the Internet Archive). Thus, the headline of this article and the way this bill is discussed in the media is misleading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course the intent of this bill is (hopefully) to protect search engines and archiving tools such as WebCite [http://www.webcitation.org] (a Canadian-made counterpart of the Internet Archive). Thus, the headline of this article and the way this bill is discussed in the media is misleading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/5562/comment-page-1#comment-16875</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2005 19:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-16875</guid>
		<description>See my letter to the editor about this article:  http://www.globetechnology.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20050713.gtgooglelter0713/BNStory/Technology/

We all need to realize who the beneficiaries of these overly-complex laws are, and that is the incumbent old-media intermediaries.  Having web-pages on the anonymous part of the Internet be able to be cached, mirrored, indexed and viewed without additional payment or permission is major competition for the old-media content industry who believe that all creativity must have per-unity royalty payments.  These incumbent special interests want to eradicate all competition by forcing everyone to use their business model, and to only be able to use technologies which they control.

This is a 10+ year old debate now that was launched in the USA by the USPTO with their &quot;Intellectual Property and the National Information Infrastructure&quot; from 1995 
http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/doc/ipnii/

Simplistic logic: unless all new media was modified legally and technically to retain the limitations of the old media (primarily centralized control), then no content would be created.  While this is obviously nonsense, governments have been buying into this nonsense with Canada&#039;s Bill C-60 just being the latest round.

Whether the new-media genie is put back into the bottle is up to us.  We must get politically involved and turn this mess around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See my letter to the editor about this article:  <a href="http://www.globetechnology.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20050713.gtgooglelter0713/BNStory/Technology/" rel="nofollow">http://www.globetechnology.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20050713.gtgooglelter0713/BNStory/Technology/</a></p>
<p>We all need to realize who the beneficiaries of these overly-complex laws are, and that is the incumbent old-media intermediaries.  Having web-pages on the anonymous part of the Internet be able to be cached, mirrored, indexed and viewed without additional payment or permission is major competition for the old-media content industry who believe that all creativity must have per-unity royalty payments.  These incumbent special interests want to eradicate all competition by forcing everyone to use their business model, and to only be able to use technologies which they control.</p>
<p>This is a 10+ year old debate now that was launched in the USA by the USPTO with their &#8220;Intellectual Property and the National Information Infrastructure&#8221; from 1995<br />
<a href="http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/doc/ipnii/" rel="nofollow">http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/doc/ipnii/</a></p>
<p>Simplistic logic: unless all new media was modified legally and technically to retain the limitations of the old media (primarily centralized control), then no content would be created.  While this is obviously nonsense, governments have been buying into this nonsense with Canada&#8217;s Bill C-60 just being the latest round.</p>
<p>Whether the new-media genie is put back into the bottle is up to us.  We must get politically involved and turn this mess around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/5562/comment-page-1#comment-16810</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 12:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-16810</guid>
		<description>WEBSITE ARCHIVING IS GOOD! ANYONE THAT SAYS OTHERWISE, OBVIOUSLY HAS NEVER USED/NEEDED ONE!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WEBSITE ARCHIVING IS GOOD! ANYONE THAT SAYS OTHERWISE, OBVIOUSLY HAS NEVER USED/NEEDED ONE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/5562/comment-page-1#comment-16798</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 07:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-16798</guid>
		<description>If i had enough money i&#039;d patent the concept of &quot;encoding information in visual symbols capable of being placed onto a 2 dimensional surface&quot;.

Then when the patent office sent me the letter informing me that i&#039;d succeeded, i&#039;d sue them for breaching my patent on writing... Because that&#039;s what it would be. And hieroglyphics etc etc etc.

As long as i applied for it with the US patent office i have no doubt the morons would grant it. Hell i&#039;d probly get it past most of the other patent offices around the world too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If i had enough money i&#8217;d patent the concept of &#8220;encoding information in visual symbols capable of being placed onto a 2 dimensional surface&#8221;.</p>
<p>Then when the patent office sent me the letter informing me that i&#8217;d succeeded, i&#8217;d sue them for breaching my patent on writing&#8230; Because that&#8217;s what it would be. And hieroglyphics etc etc etc.</p>
<p>As long as i applied for it with the US patent office i have no doubt the morons would grant it. Hell i&#8217;d probly get it past most of the other patent offices around the world too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/5562/comment-page-1#comment-16790</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 06:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-16790</guid>
		<description>As you are seeing here is part of the problem in the US. Our legislators are so busy playing politics that things like this slide through without contention. With a total majority in both house and senate, many bills are cobbled together without dual partisan support and then rushed to the vote with very limited time to discover what exactly is in the bill. Laying 10 preposed bills totally 900 pages each on a legislators desk and saying we vote in two days doesn&#039;t leave time to discover all the tricks buried in the writing. If it looks good on the top, it should be good in the depths, eh? Wrong. 

We need a total kick of all parties in the US and an independent party for a turn in the White House, if for no other reason than to declare that the voters have had enough and that politics is about running the country, not running the country into the ground. A steady onslaught of just such bills has resulted in much of what the US has today in laws. Those that were purchased straight out, had well known problems as the one mentioned above and the open and close quick ramrod vote doesn&#039;t leave time to fix it. Nor does the lack of involvement with both parties in the crafting help either. 

I for one am tired of seeing the country go to hell in a handbasket as our legislators cater to the corporations at the expense of the citzen. Without our aid they can&#039;t stay in office long enough to do the damage they are doing now. I for one say vote every Washington critter out of there and put totally new faces in. Term limits to go with it so that political dynasties can&#039;t be formed. 

From one that is fed up and had enough...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you are seeing here is part of the problem in the US. Our legislators are so busy playing politics that things like this slide through without contention. With a total majority in both house and senate, many bills are cobbled together without dual partisan support and then rushed to the vote with very limited time to discover what exactly is in the bill. Laying 10 preposed bills totally 900 pages each on a legislators desk and saying we vote in two days doesn&#8217;t leave time to discover all the tricks buried in the writing. If it looks good on the top, it should be good in the depths, eh? Wrong. </p>
<p>We need a total kick of all parties in the US and an independent party for a turn in the White House, if for no other reason than to declare that the voters have had enough and that politics is about running the country, not running the country into the ground. A steady onslaught of just such bills has resulted in much of what the US has today in laws. Those that were purchased straight out, had well known problems as the one mentioned above and the open and close quick ramrod vote doesn&#8217;t leave time to fix it. Nor does the lack of involvement with both parties in the crafting help either. </p>
<p>I for one am tired of seeing the country go to hell in a handbasket as our legislators cater to the corporations at the expense of the citzen. Without our aid they can&#8217;t stay in office long enough to do the damage they are doing now. I for one say vote every Washington critter out of there and put totally new faces in. Term limits to go with it so that political dynasties can&#8217;t be formed. </p>
<p>From one that is fed up and had enough&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


