Comments on: Peer Impact and Peer Cash

By: 420ef9b646c02752a50db0d19c3d37d2

420ef9b646c02752a50db0d19c3d37d2 — Sat, 07 Jul 2007 08:04:57 +0000

420ef9b646c02752a50db0d19c3d37d2…

420ef9b646c02752a50db0d19c3d37d2…

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Fri, 22 Jul 2005 09:13:09 +0000

“…not yuppies like myself who can afford to buy music and for whom the convenience of doing so is worth the price.”

That neatly encapsulates the mindset of the individual responsible for the preceding lengthy sales pitch – or, should I say, that of the “marketing geniuses” behind the Peer Impact concept.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Fri, 22 Jul 2005 04:20:19 +0000

That’s so tragic, it’s almost funny!

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Fri, 22 Jul 2005 01:13:32 +0000

read this and then you will understand what Peer Impact is about

[What follows is a long and windy lift. If you want to read it, go here: http://novaspivack.typepad.com/nova_spivacks_weblog/2004/07/superdistributi.html - Ed]

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 21 Jul 2005 23:18:12 +0000

Let me get this right, I pay for my internet connection, electricity, and for the music. I leave the computer on and hooked up and load my drives with music. IF I am lucky enough that someone uses my bandwidth to get the song, I get what? This isn’t even real money. I doubt that my utilities would accept this (what was it again?) Peer Cash, as payment for their services. No matter what I do in this process it is always going to cost, no matter how many songs people chose to d/l from me. The theoritical is rarely going to be met. This is closer to pymarid selling than an oppurtunity with just another scheme to slice away from you the user money and in this case your bandwidth also. Must be nice to get such ardent supporters to defend it as well.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 21 Jul 2005 23:03:50 +0000

“We mock what we don’t understand”

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 21 Jul 2005 19:00:27 +0000

I don’t think this will work in a million years. Ah well, I hope they burn through the cash quickly and let us get on with Bitlord. I’m certainly not agnostic when it comes to my favourite torrent app.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 21 Jul 2005 09:40:43 +0000

This may sound like fun play on words, but in reality there’s more to it than that. The term “New World Order (NWO)” and “One World Government” actually refer to the same “organization.” Look into it. You’ll find it very intriging and scary!

Happy researching, cheers!

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 21 Jul 2005 09:25:46 +0000

OK if your going to report on something at least get your facts straight

Each upload with Peer Impact can get you up to 5% of the sale so you can earn more of a discount then you state ..If there are 2 sources uploading you get 2.5% per upload of the sale if there are 5 sources you get 1% per upload .Seed server sources are not counted as a source for Peercash purposes .So you can save more than the 9c on the 99c you quote .You could in fact earn the price of the song back in 20 uploads in theory .

Noisemakers are like a affiliate link which you have many of on your website. If someone purchases content from Peer Impact by clicking a Noisemaker link you receive 5% of the sale and if you meet the passive distribution criteria and have that content in your shared you have a good chance of being chosen as a source this is how you can earn up to 10% .

Peercash is a discount on digital music not a get rich quick scheme and Wurld media are upfront about it, if you dont like it dont use it but dont report FUD.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 21 Jul 2005 05:37:50 +0000

New Wurld Domination

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 21 Jul 2005 04:56:28 +0000

New Wurld Order

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 21 Jul 2005 04:14:37 +0000

New Wurld Media…