Welcome to p2pnet.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
REGISTER | LOGIN
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
Reviews
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Products
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
Kids and Kartels
Scroogle Search: 
Search
 
Web p2pnet   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
    Sponsored by
Frostwire
 
p2pnet
 


mp3rocket
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code

Big Music sues more Britons

p2pnet.net News:- Predictably, with its RIAA (Recording Industry Association of America) victimizing men, women and children in the US, the Big Four record label cartel has just set its UK RIAA clone on Britons.

The BPI (British Phonographic Industry) says civil proceedings are being issued today against three men and two women in King`s Lynn, Crawley, Port Talbot, Brighton and South Glamorgan.

The BPI will claim compensation and costs on behalf of its member record companies whose music has been uploaded on to peer-to-peer networks without permission, it says.

As with other cartel enforcers, the BPI first attempts to shake people down with shabby ’settlement’ offers.

Then, the law must take its course, it says. We will be seeking an injunction and full damages for the losses they have caused, in addition to the considerable legal costs we are incurring as a result of their illegal activity.”

In the meanwhile, Big Music’s efforts notwithstanding, file sharing continues to increase around the world as music lovers demonstrate their refusal to buy shoddy, grossly over-priced mp3s, preferring to look instead to independent sites and the p2p networks.

Something you think we should know? tips[at]p2pnet.net

See:-
victimizingRIAA sues 765 in new attack, p2pnet, July 28, 2005

HOME

2 Responses to “Big Music sues more Britons”

  1. Reader's Write Says:

    “in addition to the considerable legal costs we are incurring as a result of their illegal activity.”

    Well if you weren’t trying to sue them it wouldn’t be costing you anything now would it?

    Oh i’m sorry, i’m using logic again aren’t i? Bad me.

  2. Reader's Write Says:

    Also “full damages for the losses they have caused” – this will be interesting. What losses can be *proven* to have been caused by uploading mp3s? At most, I’d have thought the current cost of the tracks on iTunes, though how they will prove that the persons unknown who downloaded from these people would have otherwise purchased the tracks remains to be seen. A very interesting case. Thanks to those obstinate sharers who’re stading up to the bullies. They deserve our support.

    Chris

Leave a Reply

ONLY items referencing the post at hand, please. No links to personal sites, no personal attacks, trolling, freebie advertising, or off-topic posts. Thanks. And Cheers!

    Sponsored by
tek savvy