Comments on: Ashdown vs Hatch http://www.p2pnet.net/story/5779 p2pnet.net - reader powered Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:23:46 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/5779/comment-page-1#comment-17957 Reader's Write Wed, 03 Aug 2005 05:21:47 +0000 #comment-17957 If the candidate is either a Democrat or Republican, there is a 99% chance that that candidate has nothing but specail interests at heart. If I saw a Libertarian or Constitution Party member running for this office, then i'd be inclined to support said candidate. A candidate that fights the cartels may just be the one that wants to raise gas and property taxes. Just because a Republicrat advocate one specific type of freedom does not mean that they are pro-freedom. WATCH out! If the candidate is either a Democrat or Republican, there is a 99% chance that that candidate has nothing but specail interests at heart. If I saw a Libertarian or Constitution Party member running for this office, then i’d be inclined to support said candidate. A candidate that fights the cartels may just be the one that wants to raise gas and property taxes. Just because a Republicrat advocate one specific type of freedom does not mean that they are pro-freedom. WATCH out!

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/5779/comment-page-1#comment-17947 Reader's Write Wed, 03 Aug 2005 04:06:17 +0000 #comment-17947 When you start to see politicans positioning themselves against the stance of an incumbent and they are all leaning the same way regardless of party affilations, it gives one the idea that the time of the free for all for the content cartels might be drawing enough ire of the public to support putting such a candidate into office. It starts with one and then another candidate and the end results is either a totally unfavorable climate for the content cartels to advance their agenda or that multiple payoffs are again necessary. Time will tell if the payoff part is valid. Should the payoff part be necessary and accepted you can expect that money will come from the public, indirectly. The first thought I have is that lawsuits would increase to fund those. After all it is free money in the eyes of the cartels, there for the demanding. I for one will keep an eye on the frequency and volumes of lawsuits should this candidate against theme become popular. Just a thought... When you start to see politicans positioning themselves against the stance of an incumbent and they are all leaning the same way regardless of party affilations, it gives one the idea that the time of the free for all for the content cartels might be drawing enough ire of the public to support putting such a candidate into office. It starts with one and then another candidate and the end results is either a totally unfavorable climate for the content cartels to advance their agenda or that multiple payoffs are again necessary. Time will tell if the payoff part is valid.

Should the payoff part be necessary and accepted you can expect that money will come from the public, indirectly. The first thought I have is that lawsuits would increase to fund those. After all it is free money in the eyes of the cartels, there for the demanding. I for one will keep an eye on the frequency and volumes of lawsuits should this candidate against theme become popular.

Just a thought…

]]>