<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple&#8217;s Better Mouse</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/5788/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/5788</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/5788/comment-page-1#comment-18022</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2005 04:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18022</guid>
		<description>From: http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,122072,tk,dn080305X,00.asp

&quot;Four-button unit offers slick looks and some handy Mac-only features, but comfort isn&#039;t one of them.?

&quot;There&#039;s no reason...drop $50 on...a standard two-button optical mouse.&quot;

&quot;...isn&#039;t very comfy and defaults to standard two-button fare on the PC.&quot;

Apple sucks! Hah!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From: <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,122072,tk,dn080305X,00.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,122072,tk,dn080305X,00.asp</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Four-button unit offers slick looks and some handy Mac-only features, but comfort isn&#8217;t one of them.?</p>
<p>&#8220;There&#8217;s no reason&#8230;drop $50 on&#8230;a standard two-button optical mouse.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;isn&#8217;t very comfy and defaults to standard two-button fare on the PC.&#8221;</p>
<p>Apple sucks! Hah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


