<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: eDonkey overtakes BiTorrent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/5873/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/5873</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:45:22 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/5873/comment-page-1#comment-19333</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 05:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-19333</guid>
		<description>Edonkey is king, ive been using it for 6 years and bittorrent sucks. mind you i speak for large file sizes mainy i.e. 250MB-5GB files, all of which i have downloaded for mac and pc and work fine smaller files are they too, and all it takes to look for something is one search, it was much faster back in the day. 

long live the donkey!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edonkey is king, ive been using it for 6 years and bittorrent sucks. mind you i speak for large file sizes mainy i.e. 250MB-5GB files, all of which i have downloaded for mac and pc and work fine smaller files are they too, and all it takes to look for something is one search, it was much faster back in the day. </p>
<p>long live the donkey!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/5873/comment-page-1#comment-18370</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2005 15:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18370</guid>
		<description>Quote &quot;Microsoft video formats represent 46% of aggregate worldwide p2p traffic.&quot; since you never see a mainstream movie or television show in this format, i can only assume that porn was included in this study.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quote &#8220;Microsoft video formats represent 46% of aggregate worldwide p2p traffic.&#8221; since you never see a mainstream movie or television show in this format, i can only assume that porn was included in this study.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/5873/comment-page-1#comment-18356</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2005 08:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18356</guid>
		<description>they are not saying that anount of video files is higher on ed2k over bt.   W hat they are say is  ed2k is primarly a video transfering network and bt has more types of files being transfered</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they are not saying that anount of video files is higher on ed2k over bt.   W hat they are say is  ed2k is primarly a video transfering network and bt has more types of files being transfered</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
