<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Japan&#8217;s broadband satellite</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/5878/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/5878</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 21:25:05 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/5878/comment-page-1#comment-18421</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 10:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18421</guid>
		<description>There is nothing they can do about this, it a issue of light.  Well radio signles travile at the speed of light and this takes x time to travle y distance.

Not even Jap&#039;s can do anything about that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is nothing they can do about this, it a issue of light.  Well radio signles travile at the speed of light and this takes x time to travle y distance.</p>
<p>Not even Jap&#8217;s can do anything about that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/5878/comment-page-1#comment-18417</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 07:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18417</guid>
		<description>The issue with using satellites, are the latencies involved. I don&#039;t know if it&#039;s been improved on, but from what i&#039;ve been told there&#039;s a 2 second lagtime between you sending signals to the satellite, and it getting them. 2 whole seconds, each way. 

Which means, it takes 2 seconds for the satellite to get what you&#039;ve sent it, then 2 more seconds for it to send that to your isp, however long the isp takes to respond, 2 seconds for the isp to reply to the satellite, and then 2 seconds for the satellite to send that reply to you. I&#039;d suggest you don&#039;t try using it for gaming, the lag would be horrendous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The issue with using satellites, are the latencies involved. I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s been improved on, but from what i&#8217;ve been told there&#8217;s a 2 second lagtime between you sending signals to the satellite, and it getting them. 2 whole seconds, each way. </p>
<p>Which means, it takes 2 seconds for the satellite to get what you&#8217;ve sent it, then 2 more seconds for it to send that to your isp, however long the isp takes to respond, 2 seconds for the isp to reply to the satellite, and then 2 seconds for the satellite to send that reply to you. I&#8217;d suggest you don&#8217;t try using it for gaming, the lag would be horrendous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/5878/comment-page-1#comment-18377</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2005 18:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18377</guid>
		<description>It would be nice if we had access to high speed Internet access in remote areas as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be nice if we had access to high speed Internet access in remote areas as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
