Welcome to P2PNET.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
Register | Login
RIAA News
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
TV
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Product News
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
Kids and Kartels
Search: 
Search
 
Web P2PNET   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
MP3rocket
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code
p2pnet - rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | p2pnet celebrities: http://p2pnet.net/celeb.rss | Mobile? http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php

Bill, Steve and The iPod

p2pnet.net News:- “If you think Apple Computer’s Steve Jobs invented the technology behind the Apple iPod, don’t bet your 60GB, 15,000-song model on it,” says InformationWeek.

If that comes as a complete surprise to you, it shouldn’t. Steve is great at identifying technologies other people created and turning them into gold. In other words, he’s a marketer more than an inventor but now, according to the US Patent and Trademark Office, “patent applications that cover much of the technology associated with the iPod were submitted by Microsoft,” says the story.

AppleInsider has already reported that the iPod interface patent application was turned down and it seems the basis for the denial was a, “similar method outlined in a Microsoft researcher’s patent application, filed after the iPod was introduced but before Apple sought its own patent,” says the Seattle Post-Intelligencer.

And, “If the patents hold up on appeal, Apple could be accountable for royalties,” says InformationWeek, going on:

“Microsoft’s claim appears to center on the work of John C. Platt, a senior researcher in the Knowledge Tools Group at Microsoft Research. According to media reports, on behalf of Microsoft, Platt applied for the patent in May of 2002 some five months before the Apple filing. Platt’s application was rejected in December 2004, but he amended it in April of this year and Microsoft’s pending patent was subsequently approved.”

Says the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, “The initial rejection of Apple’s patent, and the approval of Microsoft’s patent, could make it possible for other device makers to more closely follow the on-screen design of the iPod in their own music players. Microsoft works with hardware companies, including Royal Philips Electronics, Samsung Electronics, iRiver and others who use its digital-music software.

“Regardless of the outcome, Microsoft doesn’t intend to try to block Apple from the market, said David Kaefer, business development director for Microsoft’s intellectual property and licensing group. ‘We have a long-standing practice of licensing things to Apple and licensing Apple’s patents to use in our products,’ Kaefer said. ‘Our approach is to recognize that, frankly, we’re both mutually dependent on the good ideas of one another’.”

If there’s omething you think we should know, contact us - tips[at]p2pnet.net

See:-
InformationWeek - Did Microsoft Invent The iPod, August 12, 2005
turned down - Apple iPod interface in danger, p2pnet, August 10, 2005
Seattle Post-Intelligencer - Microsoft beats Apple to punch on key iPod patent, August 12, 2005

HOME

4 Responses to “Bill, Steve and The iPod”

  1. Reader's Write Says:

    “a Microsoft researcher’s patent application, filed after the iPod was introduced”
    This is Microsoft filing a patent AFTER Apple has released the iPod, so it is obviously not a case of Apple “borrowing” anything from MS. If anything there should be questions about where this MS employee got his ideas. Apple stupidly waited far to long to patent an idea they had already implemented, but to suggest that Microsoft is in anyway responsible for the iPod is absurd.

  2. Reader's Write Says:

    It’s not an issue of microsoft coming up with the ipod first. Bottom line, they legally outmanuevered Apple with the patents. Then again, how a company comes out with a market changing product like the iPod but doesn’t have the presence of mind to patent it is beyond me. Maybe they should have spent less time and money on marketing campaigns and public relations and spent more time with their legal department!

    Microsoft got this one fair and square. With any luck this will help push the iPod, which is a sub-par device in all regards (except style) back from the forefront of the DAP market.

    Long live the law!

    -Nev

  3. Reader's Write Says:

    heh… I wonder if microsoft could force Apple licence fairplay drm in order to continue the use of the iPod interface……

    Either way it will be kind of funny that all the mac lovers will be giving Microsoft money when they buy an apple product…

  4. Reader's Write Says:

    Ummm, duhh,

    It’s called “prior art” bitches.

    This story has been wrongly reported starting with a “rumor” reported by Appleinsider.com. The story was then regurgitated, with pro MS embelishmennts and titles like ‘Did MS invent the iPod’, by a bunch of ‘know nothing else but bytes’ tech. reporters. Then you little MS fanboys get your little woodies and say ‘ah-ha, we always knewr that Bill would get Apple and it’s iPod!”

    Fact is, you can’t patent something that already exists, it’s *FiRsT to iNvEnT*, not *FiRsT to FiLe*. Apple has NOTHING to fear from the MS patent, which is still under review after being rejected itself BTW!!!!
    see: http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PG01&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=%2220030221541%22.PGNR.&OS=DN/20030221541&RS=DN/20030221541

Leave a Reply

    Advertisments
Teksavvy