Comments on: UK New Years mobile record http://www.p2pnet.net/story/619 p2pnet.net - reader powered Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:27:01 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1 By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/619#comment-123 Reader's Write Mon, 26 Jan 2004 03:09:11 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/619#comment-123 The thing that really sucks is that people make mistakes. The thing that really sucks is that people make mistakes.

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/619#comment-119 Reader's Write Sun, 25 Jan 2004 11:52:06 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/619#comment-119 I was wondering about that, 111M seemed a bit much. I thought there was a max of half that in the entire country. I was wondering about that, 111M seemed a bit much. I thought there was a max of half that in the entire country.

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/619#comment-114 Reader's Write Sat, 24 Jan 2004 00:30:54 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/619#comment-114 Read the linked press release -- it says that 111M messages were sent, not that 111M people sent messages. It's a shame this was misreported by p2pnet; the real story is of interest without being hyped into falsehood. Unfortunately, Google News is leading with this erroneous story. Read the linked press release — it says that 111M messages were sent, not that 111M people sent messages.

It’s a shame this was misreported by p2pnet; the real story is of interest without being hyped into falsehood.

Unfortunately, Google News is leading with this erroneous story.

]]>