Welcome to p2pnet.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
REGISTER | LOGIN
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
Reviews
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Products
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
Kids and Kartels
Scroogle Search: 
Search
 
Web p2pnet   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
    Sponsored by
Frostwire
 
p2pnet
 


mp3rocket
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code

RIAA attacks p2p companies

p2p news / p2pnet:- Having spent the last couple of years unsuccessfully trying to terrorize American men, women and children into buying ‘product,’ The Big Music cartel`s RIAA (Recording Industry Association of America) is now attempting to use similar tactics on the p2p file sharing companies themselves.

The RIAA’s owners, EMI (Britain), UMG (France), Sony BMG (Japan, Germany) and WMG (US), claim file sharing is “devastating” them, that the practice is costing them lost sales, and that their sue ‘em all campaign is have a significant deterrent effect.

Big Champagne, the premier p2p research company, told p2pnet that in August, this year, an average of 6,871,308 people were logged onto the p2p net works at the same time. Globally, the number was 9,620,261.

The statistics for the same period last year were 4,549,801 and 6,822,312 respectively.

Meanwhile, the multi-billion-dollar music industry is reporting record profits, it’s never been shown that even a single song shared equals a sale lost, and as far as the terror campaign goes, all it’s achieved is to cause extreme hardship to close to 14,000 ordinary American men, women and children, none of whom has ever appeared in court and none of whom has ever been found guilty of anything.

Now the RIAA has sent Cease & Desist letters to seven US p2 file sharing application companies ordering them to, immediately cease and desist from enabling and inducing the infringement of RIAA member sound recordings”.

The ricochet effect
The demands are clearly an attempt by to try capitalize on the recent US Supreme Court Grokster v MGM decision, which ruled the makers of the apps can be held liable if users of their software download copyrighted works, establishing secondary liability for copyright infringement.

LimeWire, one of the recipients, has already gone offline to a great extent and if the labels succeed in intimidating any of the other companies, the effects would, of course, ricochet well beyond the US, even though the court decision applies only to America.

Strangely, Morpheus owner StreamCast Networks wasn’t on the RIAA C&D list. A spokesman told p2pnet the company hadn’t received a missive, and wouldn’t comment on whether or not this may have been because StreamCast company is already a principal defendant in the Grokster case.

Pay Us, Or Else
The attempts to cow the p2p firms are part of ongoing efforts by the entertainment and software cartels as a whole to use their immense financial, legal and political resources to gain total control of what people see, hear and do online.

The record label cartel always makes its victims an offer they can’t refuse: Pay Us, or we’ll sue you in a civil court. The victims always pay, believing they’d be unable to stand up to the multinational companies and their expert lawyers.

This may be about to change, however.

One mother, Patricia Santangelo, from New York, has decided to stand up against the labels, and another, Dawnell Leadbetter from the Seattle area, is also denying infringing record label copyrights, her lawyers having filed an answer refuting the allegations in the RIAA complaint.

Four other RIAA victims that we know of are getting ready to tell the Big Four their terror tactics will no longer work. And there’ll be more in the wings.

So definitely stay tuned.

Something you think we should know? tips[at]p2pnet.net

See:-
gone offlineIs LimeWire closing down?, July 27, 2005
Patricia SantangeloRIAA victim talks to p2pnet, September 4, 2005
denying infringingAnother RIAA victim fights back, September 10, 2005
terror tacticsRIAA ‘fines’ students $3,750, September 9, 2005

HOME

9 Responses to “RIAA attacks p2p companies”

  1. Reader's Write Says:

    Can we assume the other recipients were the most popular apps?
    Could you please tell us who all the recipeints were?

  2. Reader's Write Says:

    i second the request. :)

  3. Reader's Write Says:

    I think its appalling that the RIAA still isnt giving up and trying to make money from technology. They’ve sued people, it didnt work, move on and try a better tactic. P2P companies arent responsible for the content, they simply write the software, they have no control of filtering. This is much ways that the VCR and CD burner can be used for legit or illegitimate purpose. Even a water bong and medication can be used for legal or illegal purposes, companies are not responsible. The riaa will be the last group to accept this. I wonder what the riaa will think of next, there is no proof that a download equals a lost sale, what with the high prices of the economy its no wonder we dont buy anything. The music and movie industry arent going anywhere and it just seems like bullying tactics to go after the underdog, but rest assured that their tactics have made it so i never buy another media item unless its a blank dvd.
    MP-A

  4. Reader's Write Says:

    Find more information here:
    http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9588_22-5867085.html

    only 3 are listed right now: BearShare, WinMX and LimeWire

  5. Reader's Write Says:

    I know of BearShare, LimeWire & WinMX

  6. Reader's Write Says:

    Check out the story here too:

    http://news.com.com/RIAA+sends+letters+to+P2P+services/2100-1030_3-5867085.html?tag=nefd.top

  7. Reader's Write Says:

    P2P users will just switch to companies in other country’s it’s not going to stop.

  8. Reader's Write Says:

    P2P users don’t HAVE to switch, actually.
    The ONLY thing the RIAA will eliminate is the company.

    Those clients are fully developed and fully functioning.
    As long as those clients exist, the “networks” will exist.
    The clients only use protocols that enable individuals
    to connect to each other. They are not really part of
    ANY centralized “network” per se.

    Eliminating the company will only halt those clients at their
    current, fully functioning version :) . No need to have an “update” of something that works well.

    I’d love to see them try to eliminate those clients once they
    shut down those companies.

    And then there are open source P2P clients in the works.
    How can they “Cease and Desist” and unknown author ?

    It’s posturing and poop.
    I wouldn’t sweat this.

  9. Reader's Write Says:

    All of this litigation is getting to be a real pain in the ass. Let’s hope there’s a ray of light at the end of the tunnel.

Leave a Reply

ONLY items referencing the post at hand, please. No links to personal sites, no personal attacks, trolling, freebie advertising, or off-topic posts. Thanks. And Cheers!

    Sponsored by
tek savvy