eDonkey joins Sharman Networks
p2p news / p2pnet:- Interesting times, in the Confucian sense, are upon the independant p2p industry.
In the latest revelation, Sharman Networks has been given a large, and very badly needed, leg up with the news that eDonkey has signed up for its [Sharman’s] DCIA (Distributed Computing Industry Association).
Yesterday, The Wall Street Journal said corporate download company Mashboxx and Grokster may soon be one.
Ex-Grokster-and-now-Mashboxx boss Wayne Rosso was in meetings until late yesterday and, “Although I can’t comment on any negotiations that may or may not have taken place in the past, present, and for good luck let’s throw in the future as well, ” he told p2pnet, “we’re always looking for strategic acquisitions that make sense.”
Echoing loudly as these various machinations occur is the US Supreme Court’s recent Grokster vs MGM decision for which, “We hold that one who distributes a device with the object of promoting its use to infringe copyright, as shown by the clear expression or other affirmative steps taken to foster infringement, is liable for the resulting acts of infringement by third parties,” wrote Justice David H. Souter.
LimeWire went to ground almost immediately afterwards and is still keeping its head down with the company refusing to answer inquiries as to what its plans are, now that it’s effectively removed itself from the front lines.
And the Australian federal court recently ruled that Sharman’s Kazaa induced users to infringe copyrights, to all intents and purposes burying the p2p application, already in an advanced stage of decomposition brought on by its prolonged use of spyware.
P2P Revenue Engine
Meanwhile, “Please warmly welcome MetaMachine,” says a DCIA post. “The company participated in the DCIA’s P2P Revenue Engine (P2PRE) project focused on providing solutions for major entertainment content rights holders to securely market their copyrighted works via the P2P distribution channel.”
eDonkey’s presence will lend respectability to the ‘trade’ organization, started by Sharman to help get Brilliant Digital entertainment and Altnet products off the ground; to bolster Kazaa; and, to present an air of respectability to the mainstream media and entertainment cartels.
While Sharman was trying to resurrect Kazaa, the company’s friends and associates, Brilliant and Altnet, spent millions of dollars in a bid to convince the major labels and movie studios that Altnet’s lame duck TrueNames DRM product was just what was needed to ‘protect’ copyrighted files, and that Kazaa was the ideal delivery vehicle.
The cartels didn’t want to know, however, and about the only entity with a hope of going anywhere was the DCIA, under the relentless stewardship of Marty Lafferty. And with eDonkey on board, the Sharman project will begin to come across as though it actually is a representative trade organization. And as such, it should be able to lure other companies into the fold, opening up new opportunities for Sharman in the process.
However, a hitherto confidential briefing document that came out during the Kazaa trial has Altnet admitting: ‘The technologies are so intertwined that they cannot be decoupled, except at the barest of technical levels. As well, the companies marketing strategies [are] similarly related, so much so that the future success of Sharman Networks and Altnet systems depend on one another’.”
It’s an interesting juxtaposition with eDonkey, once a strong supporter of the independant p2p community, becoming part and parcel of an organization which boasts of including DRM (Digital Restriction Management) technology in its inventory.
And not coincidentally, one of the DCIA’s favoured tools is the Hollywood-inspired DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act).
eDonkey, RIP.
Something you think we should know? tips[at]p2pnet.net
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win
- Mohandas Gandhi
See:-
soon be one - Mashboxx to swallow Grokster?, September 19, 2005
infringe copyright - Supreme court rules for MGM, June 27, 2005
infringe copyrights - Big Music cartel nails Sharman, September 5, 2005
lame duck TrueNames - Altnet trying to ‘mug’ companies, January 13, 2005
briefing document - The Altnet Kazaa alliance, February 7, 2005
Hollywood-inspired - Sharman woos Hollywood, June 19, 2004





p2pnet - rss feed: 
September 20th, 2005 at 3:02 pm
So does this mean that the two programs will merge together or Kazaa will become ed2k sh4 hash value or what? I know the sh1 hash has already been broken and thats why their (Sherman’s) network is full of corrupt files.
September 20th, 2005 at 3:23 pm
We will have at least one filesharing system that will remain free.
September 20th, 2005 at 3:27 pm
Most of the commercial p2p industry is going to move to a pay to peer model in the near future, its inevitable now they cant really generate revenue from Adware or Spyware and they continue to recive legal pressure from the content owners .
Only Open source and Darknet apps will remain true to peer to peer filesharing as we know it .
September 20th, 2005 at 3:32 pm
the problem is that kazaa does not use sha-1 hashing even if sha-1 has been broken you still need a major supercomputer to do it. Edonkey is not merging with kazaa. the dcia trade and lobbying group
September 20th, 2005 at 5:46 pm
This to me is actually a silver lining. As more of the commercial apps go the pay to peer route, more and more users will move to opensource, adware free, spyware free, apps that provide better protections.
Maybe some of the fine apps developed in opensource that have starved for lack of users will finally take off.
By getting rid of the more dumbed down apps, users will be forced to move to apps with a longer learning curve.
This could lead to a smarter p2p community all around.
September 20th, 2005 at 6:31 pm
donkey = slow, torrent = fast, next gen ? Hmm I suggest “lightspeed”
Does anyone seriously believe the edonkey thing has any future ? Really it’s a pain-in-the-ass and torrent + usenet is far superior and they’re not controlled by any shitty company…
September 21st, 2005 at 12:41 am
err, wouldn;t the riaa/mpaa/antichrist incorporated pretty much own sharman after the australian legal bitchslap they got? Would the riaa/otherjackasses own trunames/altnet as well?
September 21st, 2005 at 4:33 am
Sharman did not start the DCIA. It was Derek Broes who know is at Microsoft In believe.