<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: eDonkey joins Sharman Networks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6305/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6305</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 23:04:15 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6305/comment-page-1#comment-20467</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-20467</guid>
		<description>Sharman did not start the DCIA.  It was Derek Broes who know is at Microsoft In believe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sharman did not start the DCIA.  It was Derek Broes who know is at Microsoft In believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6305/comment-page-1#comment-20454</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2005 05:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-20454</guid>
		<description>err, wouldn;t the riaa/mpaa/antichrist incorporated pretty much own sharman after the australian legal bitchslap they got? Would the riaa/otherjackasses own trunames/altnet as well?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>err, wouldn;t the riaa/mpaa/antichrist incorporated pretty much own sharman after the australian legal bitchslap they got? Would the riaa/otherjackasses own trunames/altnet as well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6305/comment-page-1#comment-20425</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 23:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-20425</guid>
		<description>donkey = slow, torrent = fast, next gen ? Hmm I suggest &quot;lightspeed&quot; :D
Does anyone seriously believe the edonkey thing has any future ? Really it&#039;s a pain-in-the-ass and torrent + usenet is far superior and they&#039;re not controlled by any shitty company...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>donkey = slow, torrent = fast, next gen ? Hmm I suggest &#8220;lightspeed&#8221; <img src='http://www.p2pnet.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Does anyone seriously believe the edonkey thing has any future ? Really it&#8217;s a pain-in-the-ass and torrent + usenet is far superior and they&#8217;re not controlled by any shitty company&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6305/comment-page-1#comment-20422</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 22:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-20422</guid>
		<description>This to me is actually a silver lining. As more of the commercial apps go the pay to peer route, more and more users will move to opensource, adware free, spyware free, apps that provide better protections.

Maybe some of the fine apps developed in opensource that have starved for lack of users will finally take off.

By getting rid of the more dumbed down apps, users will be forced to move to apps with a longer learning curve.
This could lead to a smarter p2p community all around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This to me is actually a silver lining. As more of the commercial apps go the pay to peer route, more and more users will move to opensource, adware free, spyware free, apps that provide better protections.</p>
<p>Maybe some of the fine apps developed in opensource that have starved for lack of users will finally take off.</p>
<p>By getting rid of the more dumbed down apps, users will be forced to move to apps with a longer learning curve.<br />
This could lead to a smarter p2p community all around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6305/comment-page-1#comment-20414</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 20:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-20414</guid>
		<description>the problem is that kazaa does not use sha-1 hashing   even if  sha-1 has been broken you still need a major supercomputer to do it.    Edonkey is not merging with kazaa.  the  dcia  trade and lobbying group</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the problem is that kazaa does not use sha-1 hashing   even if  sha-1 has been broken you still need a major supercomputer to do it.    Edonkey is not merging with kazaa.  the  dcia  trade and lobbying group</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6305/comment-page-1#comment-20413</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 20:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-20413</guid>
		<description>Most of the commercial p2p industry is going to move to a pay to peer model in the near future, its inevitable now they cant really generate revenue from Adware or Spyware and they continue to recive legal pressure from the content owners .

Only Open source and Darknet apps will remain true to peer to peer filesharing as we know it .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of the commercial p2p industry is going to move to a pay to peer model in the near future, its inevitable now they cant really generate revenue from Adware or Spyware and they continue to recive legal pressure from the content owners .</p>
<p>Only Open source and Darknet apps will remain true to peer to peer filesharing as we know it .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6305/comment-page-1#comment-20412</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 20:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-20412</guid>
		<description>We will have at least one filesharing system that will remain free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We will have at least one filesharing system that will remain free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6305/comment-page-1#comment-20409</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 20:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-20409</guid>
		<description>So does this mean that the two programs will merge together or Kazaa will become ed2k sh4 hash value or what? I know the sh1 hash has already been broken and thats why their (Sherman&#039;s) network is full of corrupt files.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So does this mean that the two programs will merge together or Kazaa will become ed2k sh4 hash value or what? I know the sh1 hash has already been broken and thats why their (Sherman&#8217;s) network is full of corrupt files.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
