<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Arms supplier in device wars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6373/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6373</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6373/comment-page-1#comment-20959</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 03:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-20959</guid>
		<description>&quot;We gave them a seven-year license at vastly below-market rate to allow that business model to occur. There is no reason for their content cost to be one-tenth of what everyone else is paying and have this done on the backs of the music industry while they pay market rate to the NFL, Howard Stern, and Major League Baseball

In other words, we may help out our buddies at the time (illigal price control) then when we decide we want more, we will either ask you, sue you, or both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We gave them a seven-year license at vastly below-market rate to allow that business model to occur. There is no reason for their content cost to be one-tenth of what everyone else is paying and have this done on the backs of the music industry while they pay market rate to the NFL, Howard Stern, and Major League Baseball</p>
<p>In other words, we may help out our buddies at the time (illigal price control) then when we decide we want more, we will either ask you, sue you, or both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6373/comment-page-1#comment-20883</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-20883</guid>
		<description>Ed, listen up. Noone cares. We don&#039;t give a damn about your &quot;need&quot; to monetize your crap so your damned shareholder-parasites can get another cent per share in their dividend this year ok? We are sick to death of being gouged for money every time we turn around. Shut up, and go away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed, listen up. Noone cares. We don&#8217;t give a damn about your &#8220;need&#8221; to monetize your crap so your damned shareholder-parasites can get another cent per share in their dividend this year ok? We are sick to death of being gouged for money every time we turn around. Shut up, and go away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6373/comment-page-1#comment-20845</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 03:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-20845</guid>
		<description>Does anyone remember Edgar Jr&#039;s self-arranged kidnapping adventure back in the 1970s to get some money out of Daddy?  Nice to see he&#039;s made something of himself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone remember Edgar Jr&#8217;s self-arranged kidnapping adventure back in the 1970s to get some money out of Daddy?  Nice to see he&#8217;s made something of himself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6373/comment-page-1#comment-20827</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 00:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-20827</guid>
		<description>I simply can not believe that this nut is going to stand there and make statements like, âWe have to keep thinking how we are going to monetize our product for our shareholders,â. Where is all this concern for the shareholders when it comes to CEO bonuses? Basically CEO bonuses happen whether the CEO preforms or doesn&#039;t preform. There is no withdrawal of the bonus for lack of preformance. If the CEO is released ahead of the contractual obligations, why are those bonuses still made even though the CEO won&#039;t be there to do his job? You call that shareholder protection? I sure won&#039;t want you gaurding my hen house. 

So it took what, 2 years to come up with a good sounding reason to increase prices that &quot;maybe&quot; the buying public would support? It was muttered a couple of years ago that the cartel wanted to raise prices and Jobs was fussing then over it. So they have finally put their collective heads together over at the cartels and came up with this silly sounding reason? lol. How long you think they gonna be satisfied with this price range if the customer swallows it and shruggs about the price increase? 

What the real problem is here is nothing but greed. In the &quot;what have  you done for me lately&quot; corporate world, showing profit on a day to day basis is job justification to keep your seat in the employed ranks. 

One has to ask just why they feel this manufactured and current music is worth any more than those of past artists that were actually  musicians. Preformance on stage has a whole different meaning today when dealing with concerts. One doesn&#039;t so much need to spend years learning to play an instrument, they need to look good for the camera, dress in skimpy and sexy outfits, and be able to do a dance routine with lip-syncing. Something about all this makes me ask &quot;Will the real musican please stand up&quot;. I sure fail to see them on the current stages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I simply can not believe that this nut is going to stand there and make statements like, âWe have to keep thinking how we are going to monetize our product for our shareholders,â. Where is all this concern for the shareholders when it comes to CEO bonuses? Basically CEO bonuses happen whether the CEO preforms or doesn&#8217;t preform. There is no withdrawal of the bonus for lack of preformance. If the CEO is released ahead of the contractual obligations, why are those bonuses still made even though the CEO won&#8217;t be there to do his job? You call that shareholder protection? I sure won&#8217;t want you gaurding my hen house. </p>
<p>So it took what, 2 years to come up with a good sounding reason to increase prices that &#8220;maybe&#8221; the buying public would support? It was muttered a couple of years ago that the cartel wanted to raise prices and Jobs was fussing then over it. So they have finally put their collective heads together over at the cartels and came up with this silly sounding reason? lol. How long you think they gonna be satisfied with this price range if the customer swallows it and shruggs about the price increase? </p>
<p>What the real problem is here is nothing but greed. In the &#8220;what have  you done for me lately&#8221; corporate world, showing profit on a day to day basis is job justification to keep your seat in the employed ranks. </p>
<p>One has to ask just why they feel this manufactured and current music is worth any more than those of past artists that were actually  musicians. Preformance on stage has a whole different meaning today when dealing with concerts. One doesn&#8217;t so much need to spend years learning to play an instrument, they need to look good for the camera, dress in skimpy and sexy outfits, and be able to do a dance routine with lip-syncing. Something about all this makes me ask &#8220;Will the real musican please stand up&#8221;. I sure fail to see them on the current stages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6373/comment-page-1#comment-20808</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2005 22:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-20808</guid>
		<description>I havn&#039;t purchased a single piece of your crap in almost 3 years!

You betchyer pricing isn&#039;t appropriate. It&#039;s still too high. The phrase &quot;monetize out product&quot; pretty much says everything that needs to be said, doesn&#039;t it?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I havn&#8217;t purchased a single piece of your crap in almost 3 years!</p>
<p>You betchyer pricing isn&#8217;t appropriate. It&#8217;s still too high. The phrase &#8220;monetize out product&#8221; pretty much says everything that needs to be said, doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


