Welcome to P2PNET.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
Register | Login
RIAA News
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
TV
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Product News
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
Kids and Kartels
Search: 
Search
 
Web P2PNET   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
Teksavvy
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code
p2pnet - rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | p2pnet celebrities: http://p2pnet.net/celeb.rss | Mobile? http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php

VoIP, broadband wiretaps

p2p news / p2pnet:- Broadband providers and VoIP services have just over a year to comply with new Federal Communications Commission regulations drawn up to make it easier for US enforcement agencies to run online ‘wiretaps’.

In a September 23 document, “Our action today is responsive to a joint petition for expedited rulemaking filed by the Department of Justice, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Drug Enforcement Administration (collectively, DOJ) in March 2004,” says the FCC.

“In its petition, DOJ asked the Commission to declare that broadband Internet access services and VoIP services are covered by CALEA. Today we respond to that request.

“This action strikes an appropriate balance between fostering competitive broadband and advanced services deployment and technological innovation on one hand, and meeting the needs of the law enforcement community on the other.”

But, “what remains uncertain is what the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA) ruling means for companies, universities, nonprofits - and even individuals offering wireless or other forms of Internet access,” says CNET News.

Of CALEA, “In response to concerns that emerging technologies such as digital and wireless communications were making it increasingly difficult for law enforcement agencies to execute authorized surveillance, Congress enacted CALEA on October 25, 1994,” says the FCC document.

“CALEA was intended to preserve the ability of law enforcement agencies to conduct electronic surveillance by requiring that telecommunications carriers and manufacturers of telecommunications equipment modify and design their equipment, facilities, and services to ensure that they have the necessary surveillance capabilities.”

CNET has Center for Democracy and Technology’s Jim Dempsey saying:

“Because of that very fundamental difference between the Internet and the public switched network, the commission has had a hard time defining who, exactly, is covered, and they have in this order completely punted on the question of who is responsible for what.”

Referring to the application of CALEA to the Internet, he’s also quoted as saying, “After a year or more of studying this question, the commission has failed to answer some basic questions. I’m afraid that the FBI will step into the vacuum and start claiming that it needs this or that.”

Something you think we should know? tips[at]p2pnet.net

See:-
CNET News - Wiretap rules for VoIP, broadband coming in 2007, September 27, 2005




HOME

4 Responses to “VoIP, broadband wiretaps”

  1. Reader's Write Says:

    Does this have any bearing on UK law at the moment?

    Will my ISP be installing wiretapping capabilities on their routers any time soon d’ya reckon?… Hope not ;)

    Baggy

    P.S. How do I recover a lost password for this site? can’t remember it for the life of me… Damn that password manager, making me (even more) lazy!

  2. Reader's Write Says:

    I wonder where this leaves eBay/Skype?

  3. Reader's Write Says:

    Why do they believe they need the ability to “wiretap” voip calls? It’s the net!!! Packets go out unprotected, unhidden, it’s easy to intercept them without the sender or receiver knowing!!! Haven’t these idiots ever heard of packet sniffers?

    Hell i’m waiting for the inevitable haxxored voip clients that’ll let you watch certain ip’s for incoming or outgoing calls, and let you listen in. Does anyone really think it’d be hard to do?

  4. Reader's Write Says:

    That’s all good and fine, but what about the clients that use encryption? Even better, what about the people who use encrypted datalinks for their communications between their computers?

    Why do you think that we were allowed to used 128-bit SSL encryption? Because the FBI and other members of the DOJ can crack it if need be. I think that when people start to use AES-256 or better, I think they will start to scream that they need to outlaw encryption because the general public at large is using currently unbreakable encryption methods.

    They say that AES will be good for a few decades.

Leave a Reply

    Advertisments
MP3rocket