<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VoIP, broadband wiretaps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6386/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6386</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:59:36 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6386/comment-page-1#comment-21140</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 23:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-21140</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s all good and fine, but what about the clients that use encryption?  Even better, what about the people who use encrypted datalinks for their communications between their computers?

Why do you think that we were allowed to used 128-bit SSL encryption?  Because the FBI and other members of the DOJ can crack it if need be.  I think that when people start to use AES-256 or better, I think they will start to scream that they need to outlaw encryption because the general public at large is using currently unbreakable encryption methods.

They say that AES will be good for a few decades.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s all good and fine, but what about the clients that use encryption?  Even better, what about the people who use encrypted datalinks for their communications between their computers?</p>
<p>Why do you think that we were allowed to used 128-bit SSL encryption?  Because the FBI and other members of the DOJ can crack it if need be.  I think that when people start to use AES-256 or better, I think they will start to scream that they need to outlaw encryption because the general public at large is using currently unbreakable encryption methods.</p>
<p>They say that AES will be good for a few decades.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6386/comment-page-1#comment-21001</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 10:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-21001</guid>
		<description>Why do they believe they need the ability to &quot;wiretap&quot; voip calls? It&#039;s the net!!! Packets go out unprotected, unhidden, it&#039;s easy to intercept them without the sender or receiver knowing!!! Haven&#039;t these idiots ever heard of packet sniffers?

Hell i&#039;m waiting for the inevitable haxxored voip clients that&#039;ll let you watch certain ip&#039;s for incoming or outgoing calls, and let you listen in. Does anyone really think it&#039;d be hard to do?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do they believe they need the ability to &#8220;wiretap&#8221; voip calls? It&#8217;s the net!!! Packets go out unprotected, unhidden, it&#8217;s easy to intercept them without the sender or receiver knowing!!! Haven&#8217;t these idiots ever heard of packet sniffers?</p>
<p>Hell i&#8217;m waiting for the inevitable haxxored voip clients that&#8217;ll let you watch certain ip&#8217;s for incoming or outgoing calls, and let you listen in. Does anyone really think it&#8217;d be hard to do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6386/comment-page-1#comment-20923</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 00:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-20923</guid>
		<description>I wonder where this leaves eBay/Skype?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder where this leaves eBay/Skype?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6386/comment-page-1#comment-20916</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 22:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-20916</guid>
		<description>Does this have any bearing on UK law at the moment?

Will my ISP be installing wiretapping capabilities on their routers any time soon d&#039;ya reckon?... Hope not ;)

Baggy

P.S. How do I recover a lost password for this site? can&#039;t remember it for the life of me... Damn that password manager, making me (even more) lazy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this have any bearing on UK law at the moment?</p>
<p>Will my ISP be installing wiretapping capabilities on their routers any time soon d&#8217;ya reckon?&#8230; Hope not <img src='http://www.p2pnet.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Baggy</p>
<p>P.S. How do I recover a lost password for this site? can&#8217;t remember it for the life of me&#8230; Damn that password manager, making me (even more) lazy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
