Welcome to p2pnet.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
REGISTER | LOGIN
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
Reviews
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Products
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
Kids and Kartels
Scroogle Search: 
Search
 
Web p2pnet   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
    Sponsored by
Frostwire
 
p2pnet
 


mp3rocket
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code

Secret cell phone surveillance

p2p news / p2pnet:- Before the US government is allowed to secretly track people via their cell phones, it should have good reason to believe a crime has been, or is about to be, committed, says the EFF.

“Allowing the government to turn anyone’s cell phone into a tracking device without probable cause will enable a surveillance society that would make Big Brother jealous,” says EFF (Electronic Frontier Foundation) staff lawyer Kevin Bankston.

Last month, the court denied a Department of Justice request to monitor a cell phone’s location.

The ruling revealed that the DOJ has routinely been securing court orders for real-time cell phone tracking without probable cause and without any law authorizing the surveillance, says the EFF.

Many cell phone users aren’t aware that their phones can be used to track their location in real-time, even when they aren’t using them.

The foundation has filed a friend-of-the-court brief opposing a DOJ motion asking the court to reconsider its pro-privacy decision.

EFF argues that the Fourth Amendment requires a search warrant for such invasive surveillance, issued under the same strict standards as warrants that authorize phone and Internet wiretaps, it says.

The government has tried to justify this gross expansion of its authority by combining two surveillance statutes, neither of which authorize cell phone tracking on their own.

But there`s no support anywhere for this argument, not in the statutes’ language, nor in legislative history, case law, or academic commentary, the EFF states.

Indeed, it contradicts the government’s own electronic evidence manual and, “It’s as if the government wants the court to believe that zero plus zero somehow equals one,” says Bankston.

The DOJ is expected to appeal to the district court if magistrate judge Orenstein denies its motion to reconsider, says the EFF, adding that the court hasn`t said when it intends to rule.

In the meanwhile, new Federal Communications Commission regulations slated for 2007 will make it easier for US enforcement agencies to run online `wiretaps`.

Something you think we should know? tips[at]p2pnet.net




HOME

7 Responses to “Secret cell phone surveillance”

  1. Reader's Write Says:

    If you are opposed to the DOJ’s wishes then clearly you have something to hide and are at the least un-American and most likely involved in terrorist or criminal activities, if not a terrorist yourself… Innocent patriotic US citizens have no need for privacy or legal oversight of intelligence gathering organizations like the DOJ, NSA, RIAA, etc… who have only the public’s best interests at heart. Relax, you are being watched….over?

    Yes Virgina, it’s sarcasm…

  2. Reader's Write Says:

    Don’t you know we’re in the middle of a war on terraaahhr? Don’t forget folks, you’re either for us or against us.

  3. Reader's Write Says:

    Yup. Gotta watch out for those tourists.

  4. Reader's Write Says:

    Is Virgina a blund?

  5. Reader's Write Says:

    Who wants to bet that the cellphone companies suggested this idea to them? And that their next bright idea, will be to make it mandatory for all americans to own, and carry on their persons at all times, a cell phone. Just to make sure the crims have theirs on them.

    Because you know, terrorists, organised crime syndicates and the like, are just so law abiding like that.

  6. Reader's Write Says:

    Then youy go ahead and give up your liberty; as for me I am not a coward and will not be bound by the concessions that the timid and the weak may make.

  7. Reader's Write Says:

    I was wondering if this applies to the track phones also?

Leave a Reply

ONLY items referencing the post at hand, please. No links to personal sites, no personal attacks, trolling, freebie advertising, or off-topic posts. Thanks. And Cheers!

    Sponsored by
tek savvy