<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Digital Restriction regime</title>
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6630</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net offers not-your-lamescream news on movies music digital media P2P peer-to-peer TV television file sharing freedom of speech open source product news Wifi mobiles company</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 02:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6630#comment-22505</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2005 01:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6630#comment-22505</guid>
		<description>I personaly think that the digital right is not the most important issue, nowadays there are too many ways to get media inputs. In our daily live we see all kinds of media around us! The viewer have no time to reject each single media inputs! Who shall arrange a proper way of media flood? Digital Rights? I guess not! I believe to set up a role for viwer to choose is more critical issue! &#60;from:thomas@flash-mobile.com&#62;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personaly think that the digital right is not the most important issue, nowadays there are too many ways to get media inputs. In our daily live we see all kinds of media around us! The viewer have no time to reject each single media inputs! Who shall arrange a proper way of media flood? Digital Rights? I guess not! I believe to set up a role for viwer to choose is more critical issue! &lt;from:thomas@flash-mobile.com&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6630#comment-22498</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 23:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6630#comment-22498</guid>
		<description>Quote: "You are right. The thing we have on our side is that the cartels lack CONTENT. So without content, consumers don't have a real reason to "upgrade".... 

For that reason, and the fact that many of us have amassed large libraries of DVDs, the next gen HD-DVD/Blu-Ray won't succeed (well) if it is pushed too early without substance. Give 3-5 years, and consumers will be ready for the High-Definition revolution!"

The cartels know this and are trying to get the laws in place now before it happens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quote: &#8220;You are right. The thing we have on our side is that the cartels lack CONTENT. So without content, consumers don&#8217;t have a real reason to &#8220;upgrade&#8221;&#8230;. </p>
<p>For that reason, and the fact that many of us have amassed large libraries of DVDs, the next gen HD-DVD/Blu-Ray won&#8217;t succeed (well) if it is pushed too early without substance. Give 3-5 years, and consumers will be ready for the High-Definition revolution!&#8221;</p>
<p>The cartels know this and are trying to get the laws in place now before it happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6630#comment-22478</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 15:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6630#comment-22478</guid>
		<description>You are right.  The thing we have on our side is that the cartels lack CONTENT.  So without content, consumers don't have a real reason to "upgrade".... 

For that reason, and the fact that many of us have amassed large libraries of DVDs, the next gen HD-DVD/Blu-Ray won't succeed (well) if it is pushed too early without substance.  Give 3-5 years, and consumers will be ready for the High-Definition revolution!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right.  The thing we have on our side is that the cartels lack CONTENT.  So without content, consumers don&#8217;t have a real reason to &#8220;upgrade&#8221;&#8230;. </p>
<p>For that reason, and the fact that many of us have amassed large libraries of DVDs, the next gen HD-DVD/Blu-Ray won&#8217;t succeed (well) if it is pushed too early without substance.  Give 3-5 years, and consumers will be ready for the High-Definition revolution!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6630#comment-22477</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 15:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6630#comment-22477</guid>
		<description>That's why I get my HD Digital Videos from the NET.   The only place to get high-quality XviD/DivX with small file size.  Heck, the only reason why my household has 'cable' tv is because my parents and sister are technophobes, and too lazy to learn.  Personally, I don't care much for lamestream media.... don't watch their propaganda machine...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s why I get my HD Digital Videos from the NET.   The only place to get high-quality XviD/DivX with small file size.  Heck, the only reason why my household has &#8216;cable&#8217; tv is because my parents and sister are technophobes, and too lazy to learn.  Personally, I don&#8217;t care much for lamestream media&#8230;. don&#8217;t watch their propaganda machine&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6630#comment-22474</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 13:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6630#comment-22474</guid>
		<description>A really big part of the issue is that the only people who are buying HDTVs are the people who have money to burn.  Two, maybe three people that I know out of several hundred actually own a HDTV.  My 27" SONY Trinitron TV is about 11 years old and it still works.  The best video that I have is S-Video.  I cannot see spending thousands to buy a HDTV when there is almost nothing out there to watch in HD format.

This article had it right.  The reason why DTV has not progressed very far is because people are not buying the HDTV equipment.  Everyone is still buying the old analog equipment, and will continue to do so because they don't want the new crap.  Even better, I think that this equates to what we are beginning to see: A backlash in the consumer market.  Why do you think that copy protected CDs are few and far between in the US?  Because of consumer backlash.  It has already happened a few times if anyone was paying attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A really big part of the issue is that the only people who are buying HDTVs are the people who have money to burn.  Two, maybe three people that I know out of several hundred actually own a HDTV.  My 27&#8243; SONY Trinitron TV is about 11 years old and it still works.  The best video that I have is S-Video.  I cannot see spending thousands to buy a HDTV when there is almost nothing out there to watch in HD format.</p>
<p>This article had it right.  The reason why DTV has not progressed very far is because people are not buying the HDTV equipment.  Everyone is still buying the old analog equipment, and will continue to do so because they don&#8217;t want the new crap.  Even better, I think that this equates to what we are beginning to see: A backlash in the consumer market.  Why do you think that copy protected CDs are few and far between in the US?  Because of consumer backlash.  It has already happened a few times if anyone was paying attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6630#comment-22468</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 10:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6630#comment-22468</guid>
		<description>I bought my HDTV video card just before the July dealine for DRM that was to apply to it.  My Plan was to receive their DRM crap, un-DRM it and redistribute it over p2p so that everyone can use the crap programming on whatever device they own.  Anything that these idiots put together will eventually be hacked.  Once hacked, it will be free for all the others to use.

What Digital Restriction Management does id delay the purchase of equipment until work arounds for DRM can be found.  I totally agree with the author in that their crap is not worth protecting.  The nice side of things is that cusomers will eventually get tired of being screwed and will turn to "piracy" and independent productions.  The media cartels are working harder than ever to impose unwanted restrictions on their customers' viewing habits.  Doing this means that they are cutting their own throats.
I guess that they enjoy having people reject the crap they sell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought my HDTV video card just before the July dealine for DRM that was to apply to it.  My Plan was to receive their DRM crap, un-DRM it and redistribute it over p2p so that everyone can use the crap programming on whatever device they own.  Anything that these idiots put together will eventually be hacked.  Once hacked, it will be free for all the others to use.</p>
<p>What Digital Restriction Management does id delay the purchase of equipment until work arounds for DRM can be found.  I totally agree with the author in that their crap is not worth protecting.  The nice side of things is that cusomers will eventually get tired of being screwed and will turn to &#8220;piracy&#8221; and independent productions.  The media cartels are working harder than ever to impose unwanted restrictions on their customers&#8217; viewing habits.  Doing this means that they are cutting their own throats.<br />
I guess that they enjoy having people reject the crap they sell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6630#comment-22466</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 09:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6630#comment-22466</guid>
		<description>Just say NO!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just say NO!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6630#comment-22455</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 03:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6630#comment-22455</guid>
		<description>Everytime the **AA's have tried or have succeded here in slipping something into law, everyone else in the world has shook their heads saying they don't agree and are glad they don't live in the US. The thing here is that is a short term view and it is now raring its ugly head there, across the pond. 

What is going on in the world scope of view is that if they can't pass it one place then they go elsewhere and try again till they are successful. After that they go back where it failed and use that as the shining example of what should be. This broadcast flag business is no different. 

I have no intention of buying a digital tv. So far they haven't been able to get it together to even set the standards to a single format. You buy something today costing several thousands of dollars to see tv and tomorrow they change the standard, just how valuable is that equipment you spent the bucks on worth?

The standards of movies and media being put out today don't match yesterday in quality. What good does it do to have HDTV and ultra-whatever surround sound to see and hear junk? Do they think junk is going to be made more platiable to the viewer if the image and sound is better? 

Well here's news to them from one that has dropped out of the tv and substription markets. I don't rent cable nor satellite programming as it isn't worth it anymore. Far too many reruns and nothing to speak of but the occasional programs here and there to stimulate the mind and senses. Mindlessness, I don't need and don't want. Those cheap to produce reality shows that are anything but a reality don't do it for me either. Neither do sitcoms nor soaps. Slanted news that doesn't represent anything but the broadcaster leaves me feeling dirty. Take all of those out of the programming of todays schedules. Also drop these MTV clones along with the source. Take out the reruns, and the remakes. Now look at whats left on tv with those removed and tell me it is worth the money?

Worse they think it is worth protecting. Ok, protect it all you want but without customers to actually buy the crap and buy the equipment needed to see it with and what do you have left? A well regulated industry with no customers isn't a benefit to anyone. So far they couldn't pay me for the service and give it to me. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everytime the **AA&#8217;s have tried or have succeded here in slipping something into law, everyone else in the world has shook their heads saying they don&#8217;t agree and are glad they don&#8217;t live in the US. The thing here is that is a short term view and it is now raring its ugly head there, across the pond. </p>
<p>What is going on in the world scope of view is that if they can&#8217;t pass it one place then they go elsewhere and try again till they are successful. After that they go back where it failed and use that as the shining example of what should be. This broadcast flag business is no different. </p>
<p>I have no intention of buying a digital tv. So far they haven&#8217;t been able to get it together to even set the standards to a single format. You buy something today costing several thousands of dollars to see tv and tomorrow they change the standard, just how valuable is that equipment you spent the bucks on worth?</p>
<p>The standards of movies and media being put out today don&#8217;t match yesterday in quality. What good does it do to have HDTV and ultra-whatever surround sound to see and hear junk? Do they think junk is going to be made more platiable to the viewer if the image and sound is better? </p>
<p>Well here&#8217;s news to them from one that has dropped out of the tv and substription markets. I don&#8217;t rent cable nor satellite programming as it isn&#8217;t worth it anymore. Far too many reruns and nothing to speak of but the occasional programs here and there to stimulate the mind and senses. Mindlessness, I don&#8217;t need and don&#8217;t want. Those cheap to produce reality shows that are anything but a reality don&#8217;t do it for me either. Neither do sitcoms nor soaps. Slanted news that doesn&#8217;t represent anything but the broadcaster leaves me feeling dirty. Take all of those out of the programming of todays schedules. Also drop these MTV clones along with the source. Take out the reruns, and the remakes. Now look at whats left on tv with those removed and tell me it is worth the money?</p>
<p>Worse they think it is worth protecting. Ok, protect it all you want but without customers to actually buy the crap and buy the equipment needed to see it with and what do you have left? A well regulated industry with no customers isn&#8217;t a benefit to anyone. So far they couldn&#8217;t pay me for the service and give it to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
