<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UK gmail.com bites the dust</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6646/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6646</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:59:30 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6646/comment-page-1#comment-22564</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2005 19:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-22564</guid>
		<description>Why did Google not think of the following options:

GetMail
GoMail

Reason: All common words in the dictionary are taken up as trademark names and with a friendly court any use of any word, in some corner of the world, can lead to trademark infringement damages.

Is this why the GOOGLE word was invented?

Rafael Venegas
http://www.gvenegas.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why did Google not think of the following options:</p>
<p>GetMail<br />
GoMail</p>
<p>Reason: All common words in the dictionary are taken up as trademark names and with a friendly court any use of any word, in some corner of the world, can lead to trademark infringement damages.</p>
<p>Is this why the GOOGLE word was invented?</p>
<p>Rafael Venegas<br />
<a href="http://www.gvenegas.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.gvenegas.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
