<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wal-Mart spy chips</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6679/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6679</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6679/comment-page-1#comment-22738</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2005 11:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-22738</guid>
		<description>You can&#039;t take them off the product after you&#039;ve left the store, they&#039;re built into it. I wouldn&#039;t be at all surprised if it rapidly (if  it&#039;s not already) became illegal to tamper with or remove the rfid tags on products you&#039;ve already purchased and taken home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can&#8217;t take them off the product after you&#8217;ve left the store, they&#8217;re built into it. I wouldn&#8217;t be at all surprised if it rapidly (if  it&#8217;s not already) became illegal to tamper with or remove the rfid tags on products you&#8217;ve already purchased and taken home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6679/comment-page-1#comment-22724</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2005 05:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-22724</guid>
		<description>RFID tags respond with a specific radio code transmission they have been designed to produce, whenever they recieve a signal on a specific radio frequency.  The tag is a simple solid-state circuit that actually derrives it&#039;s transmission power from the &quot;query&quot; radio signal, giving them a limitless lifespan.

Reception of the response signal, and decoding of it, takes about as much computer power as a hand-held calculator; and the RF-capacity of a $10 walkie-talkie.  POF using these two items (and some know-how) you can build a RFID-decoder that will tell you the distance and information in any RFID tag within 500 feet.  Use two and you can triangulate.

And every doubling of RF-capacity inproves the traking distance by 100%.  This means that somebody who wnats to blow about $2,000 and has the know-how can hook up an RFID query radio strong enough to locate and ID any RFID tag in about a 5-mile radius.

Now consider that RFID tags are about 1/16th of an inch square, and weigh less than a fly fart.

This isn&#039;t a new &quot;anti-theft technology&quot;, this is a BIG-BROTHER CITIZEN TRACKING technology.  THAT is what is bad with it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RFID tags respond with a specific radio code transmission they have been designed to produce, whenever they recieve a signal on a specific radio frequency.  The tag is a simple solid-state circuit that actually derrives it&#8217;s transmission power from the &#8220;query&#8221; radio signal, giving them a limitless lifespan.</p>
<p>Reception of the response signal, and decoding of it, takes about as much computer power as a hand-held calculator; and the RF-capacity of a $10 walkie-talkie.  POF using these two items (and some know-how) you can build a RFID-decoder that will tell you the distance and information in any RFID tag within 500 feet.  Use two and you can triangulate.</p>
<p>And every doubling of RF-capacity inproves the traking distance by 100%.  This means that somebody who wnats to blow about $2,000 and has the know-how can hook up an RFID query radio strong enough to locate and ID any RFID tag in about a 5-mile radius.</p>
<p>Now consider that RFID tags are about 1/16th of an inch square, and weigh less than a fly fart.</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t a new &#8220;anti-theft technology&#8221;, this is a BIG-BROTHER CITIZEN TRACKING technology.  THAT is what is bad with it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6679/comment-page-1#comment-22718</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2005 03:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-22718</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s not just a thing that buzzes the security at the door - it&#039;s a *unique* tag that can later be probed from a (small) distance without the consumers knowledge - possibly identifing the consumer if their purchase was tied to their identity...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s not just a thing that buzzes the security at the door &#8211; it&#8217;s a *unique* tag that can later be probed from a (small) distance without the consumers knowledge &#8211; possibly identifing the consumer if their purchase was tied to their identity&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6679/comment-page-1#comment-22698</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 22:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-22698</guid>
		<description>how is this any different than the current security tags Sears puts on its pants? O_o....  its just another simple security tag that will prevent even more people from walking out with items.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how is this any different than the current security tags Sears puts on its pants? O_o&#8230;.  its just another simple security tag that will prevent even more people from walking out with items.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6679/comment-page-1#comment-22694</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 21:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-22694</guid>
		<description>another good reason not to shop walmart.  unfortunatly the majority of the mass consumers will swollow this like a hungry bass swollowing a hook.  only when it&#039;s too late will they wiggle and fight but it&#039;ll be a loosing battle by then.  don&#039;t mean to sound pessimistic but whenever big business wants something, they usually get it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>another good reason not to shop walmart.  unfortunatly the majority of the mass consumers will swollow this like a hungry bass swollowing a hook.  only when it&#8217;s too late will they wiggle and fight but it&#8217;ll be a loosing battle by then.  don&#8217;t mean to sound pessimistic but whenever big business wants something, they usually get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


