<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: China is lax on piracy says US</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6764/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6764</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:23:46 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6764/comment-page-1#comment-23063</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 18:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-23063</guid>
		<description>It is America that is lax on piracy.

A music publisher ilegally claimed to be the owners of over 500 songs owned by my family, during 6 years and the American federal judge found nothing wrong with that. 

The publisher issued many licenses with our songs and millions of records were produced as a result. The judge said there was no proof of that even though on another case we proved that 16 recordings were peoduced with the phony licenses issued by the publisher that stole the songs.

The judicial system goes in one direction and government policy in another.

In the case of goverment the push arises out of the fact that the cartels have purchased the politicians. In the case of the courts, I dare not explain at present.

The details are in my web page.

Rafael Venegas
http://www.gvenegas.com



</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is America that is lax on piracy.</p>
<p>A music publisher ilegally claimed to be the owners of over 500 songs owned by my family, during 6 years and the American federal judge found nothing wrong with that. </p>
<p>The publisher issued many licenses with our songs and millions of records were produced as a result. The judge said there was no proof of that even though on another case we proved that 16 recordings were peoduced with the phony licenses issued by the publisher that stole the songs.</p>
<p>The judicial system goes in one direction and government policy in another.</p>
<p>In the case of goverment the push arises out of the fact that the cartels have purchased the politicians. In the case of the courts, I dare not explain at present.</p>
<p>The details are in my web page.</p>
<p>Rafael Venegas<br />
<a href="http://www.gvenegas.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.gvenegas.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6764/comment-page-1#comment-23061</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 15:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-23061</guid>
		<description>The US should stop crying about China being lax on piracy. Guess who are funding these pirates? Where would Baidu&#039;s MP3 search be if it wasn&#039;t for the US venture capital money supporting its growth? If Bush wants to fight Al-Qaeda by shutting off their funds, the US should do the same with the US funded piracy operations in China. Where&#039;s Mr. Sarbanes and Mr. Oxley now? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US should stop crying about China being lax on piracy. Guess who are funding these pirates? Where would Baidu&#8217;s MP3 search be if it wasn&#8217;t for the US venture capital money supporting its growth? If Bush wants to fight Al-Qaeda by shutting off their funds, the US should do the same with the US funded piracy operations in China. Where&#8217;s Mr. Sarbanes and Mr. Oxley now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
