<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guilty till proven innocent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6776/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6776</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:05:08 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6776/comment-page-1#comment-23156</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 00:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-23156</guid>
		<description>Secret Subpoena!?  Since when has the RIAA been given the authority to issue National Security Letters, authorized under the Patriot Act, binding the recipient of the subpoena to secrecy under threat of 5 years in the pokey?  The only other &#039;secret&#039; subpoena that can be issued is by the FISA (Intelligence Matters) court.  There is no such thing as a &#039;secret&#039; subpoena in a civil matter.

If these were &#039;secret&#039;, the only reason is that the ISP failed to inform that target of the subpoena, either because of incompetence or being totally gutless.  Most ISPs privacy policy states that they will notify you should they receive a subpoena for your personal information in a civil matter.  If that&#039;s the case and they didn&#039;t inform you before they forked over the goods, that&#039;s a breach of contract on their part.

If the ISPs would just stop keeping PPPoE/A and DHCP logs for more than 24 hours, this crap would completely stop.

--TurboGeek</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Secret Subpoena!?  Since when has the RIAA been given the authority to issue National Security Letters, authorized under the Patriot Act, binding the recipient of the subpoena to secrecy under threat of 5 years in the pokey?  The only other &#8217;secret&#8217; subpoena that can be issued is by the FISA (Intelligence Matters) court.  There is no such thing as a &#8217;secret&#8217; subpoena in a civil matter.</p>
<p>If these were &#8217;secret&#8217;, the only reason is that the ISP failed to inform that target of the subpoena, either because of incompetence or being totally gutless.  Most ISPs privacy policy states that they will notify you should they receive a subpoena for your personal information in a civil matter.  If that&#8217;s the case and they didn&#8217;t inform you before they forked over the goods, that&#8217;s a breach of contract on their part.</p>
<p>If the ISPs would just stop keeping PPPoE/A and DHCP logs for more than 24 hours, this crap would completely stop.</p>
<p>&#8211;TurboGeek</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6776/comment-page-1#comment-23074</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2005 00:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-23074</guid>
		<description>An IP address is NOT enough to prove someone is guilty!

And quite frankly, thats all they got... and its not enough for them to get any other proof... so they should just fck off...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An IP address is NOT enough to prove someone is guilty!</p>
<p>And quite frankly, thats all they got&#8230; and its not enough for them to get any other proof&#8230; so they should just fck off&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/6776/comment-page-1#comment-23068</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 21:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-23068</guid>
		<description>&quot;Guilty till proven innocent&quot; says it all</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Guilty till proven innocent&#8221; says it all</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
